IP Law 360

NOVEMBER 16, 2021

remain in settlement talks to resolve a patent infringement dispute over high-top sneaker designs, according to a Tuesday court filing, entering at least their fourth month of trying to resolve the suit. Steve Madden and Converse Inc.

Settlement 40

Settlement Designs Design Design Patent 40

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 9, 2022

The parties were unable to reach a settlement. PUMA also alleges that the Brooks shoe the “Aurora BL” infringes upon their Design Patent No. D897,075 and is being sold in connection with the infringing use of PUMA’s NITRO mark. 1114 and Design Patent Infringement in violation of 35 U.S.C. § § 271 and 283.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Cease and Desist Trademark Design Patent 52

Indiana Intellectual Property Law

AUGUST 13, 2021

Cross, the Plaintiff is the owner of three design patents for convertible t-shirt designs, U.S. Patent Nos. D/580,633, D/581,136 , and D/341,471 (collectively, the “Patents in Suit”). due to settlement and a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision regarding the ‘471 Patent. 35 U.S.C. §

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Design Patent Patent Designs 52

Patent Trademark Blog

JANUARY 25, 2024

A Patent Owner may submit a maximum of 20 ASIN numbers in an evaluation. APEX vs. Amazon Design Patent Neutral Evaluation Amazon’s neutral patent evaluation programs go by different names depending upon whether a utility patent or design patent is involved. APEX is for utility patents.

Copying 52

Copying Design Patent Designs Design 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

DECEMBER 13, 2021

8,726,528 (“the ’528 Patent”) and U.S. Design Patent No. D672,504 (“the ’504 Patent”) protecting its novel electric shavers were found to be infringed, and Skull Shaver was found to satisfy the domestic industry requirement of Section 337. In this initial determination, Skull Shaver’s asserted U.S.

Patent Infringement 52

Patent Infringement Patent Marketing Marketing 52

Patently-O

JANUARY 23, 2024

The plaintiff gets a TRO with an asset freeze, then starts making settlement demands. One also wonders how much money the plaintiff may have been able to extract in settlements before dismissing the case.) Additional observations : This case is a good example of why patent litigation is a poor fit for the Schedule A litigation model.

Litigation 85

Litigation Settlement Patent IP 85

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 5, 2022

In recent years, there have been a number of high-profile litigations in the United States involving patents directed to each of the above-referenced components, including patent litigations related to cathodes, 13 anodes, 14 separators, 15 electrolytes, 16 battery cell packaging, 17 and battery module packaging.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Technology Journalism IP 52