does-my-non-profit-need-trademark-protection-2 
Patently-O
MARCH 26, 2024
by Dennis Crouch My recent discussion of Vanda v. Brady’s patent claimed this combination of features, asserting that it represented a novel and non-obvious improvement over existing dredging technology. Teva references the landmark Supreme Court case of Atlantic Works v. Brady , 107 U.S. 192 (1883). Claims: 1.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 19, 2022
es as noncommercial under the Supreme Court’s First Amendment precedents—speech that does not propose a commercial transaction and is instead the product being offered to the public. This basic question has three different answers, all regularly used in any given jurisdiction—this is not a matter of circuit splits.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
JULY 21, 2021
That question is “how have various countries’ intellectual property laws addressed efforts to copyright, trademark, or patent holy names, sacred words, or outputs of creation?” So a lot is implied in, or possible from, the title ( as is often my intent on this blog ). focus and does a good job of telling that story.
IP and Legal Filings
FEBRUARY 20, 2024
Protecting personality rights has become a growing problem in India due to deepfakes, morphed pictures, etc. I bet you didn’t realise that these websites profit from selling you these things illegally? While the Constitution does not explicitly mention personality rights, In the case of Judge K.S. Puttaswamy v.
43(B)log
OCTOBER 11, 2021
Defendants also allegedly infringed RCI’s trademarks by using photographs of Roberto Coin jewelry and RCI’s logo in Kings Stone’s advertising after RCI terminated the relationship. Goldstein responded that the product does not come with any certification as to its authenticity that the black jade is genuine.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 10, 2023
Yet, since the Information Society Directive , European copyright law has preferred to protect and incentivise online business models over creativity. Later, in GS Media and Filmspeler , the Court would include constructive knowledge of the unlawful behaviour and the presence of profit as key assessment factors.
Copyright Lately
MARCH 6, 2023
There’s a fair amount to unpack here, so let’s start with the facts, which I’ve compiled from my review of court files in both New York and California. Coakley also threatened legal action against the Bergers, writing that “once this gets filed and goes public, I won’t even need to go further on the record.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
58 
Let's personalize your content