Remove even-trademark-lawyers-make-branding-mistakes-2
article thumbnail

How to Avoid the Biggest Brand management Mistakes

azrights

Apple and MacDonalds are household brands that have lost their EU trademarks in recent years, meaning that third parties may now freely use ‘Think Different’ and Big Mac in the EU. When that happens, the other party who wants to use the marks will be able to apply to have the trademark registrations cancelled.

article thumbnail

Thirteen Reasons Why Businesses Fail

azrights

Trademark disputes often arise for those who are unaware of IP, with a consequent need to rebrand. Not understanding the role of Brand Names in Business led to China Tang having to rebrand even though they had been using the name for 12 years. The purpose determines what your brand values need to be.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Does Anyone Here Have A Sense Of Humor, Redux: Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Oral Argument

LexBlog IP

On March 22, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the trademark parody case captioned Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (TDRA). The Ninth Circuit just made a mistake as to this. VIP Products LLC.

article thumbnail

Does Anyone Here Have A Sense Of Humor, Redux: Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Oral Argument

LexBlog IP

On March 22, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in the trademark parody case captioned Jack Daniel’s Properties, Inc. § 1125(c)(3)(C), thus barring as a matter of law a claim of dilution by tarnishment under the Trademark Dilution Revision Act (TDRA). The Ninth Circuit just made a mistake as to this.

article thumbnail

TMSR Session 2: Administrative Agencies and Specialized Courts

43(B)log

Even if you could navigate around capture, the scope one is harder b/c it’s systemic; you can’t give them deep knowledge on the infringement side. Two other decisionmakers in practice making lots more decisions: The UDRP panels in cybersquatting. Jeremy Sheff 2 years of expungement: what’s been happening? What to make of this?

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Retromark Volume X: the last six months in trade marks

The IPKat

Retromark Volume X: the last six months in trade marks by Darren Meale Retromark turns ten volumes, making it about four and a half human years old. Litecoin Foundation Limited v (1) Inshallah Limited (2) Nasjet Limited (3) John Pepin [2021] EWHC 1998 (Ch) (July 2021) Litecoin is a cryptocurrency, promoted and developed by the claimant.

article thumbnail

15th Trademark Scholars’ Roundtable: Session 1: Congress and the Courts (including the role of the Supreme Court)

43(B)log

Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? The purpose of trademark is consumer protection; source-identification is the most relevant consideration but not the entirety of TM law. Most have never really been lawyers. Dinwoodie and Janis taken out of context?