Remove Fair Use Remove False Advertising Remove Ownership Remove Trademark
article thumbnail

Alleging sponsorship/endorsement confusion can't defeat clear nominative fair use

43(B)log

It does so at the Rose Bowl Stadium under three contracts with Pasadena, including a Master License Agreement, Trademark Agreement, and Trademark Consent Agreement. Under these agreements, PTRA is the exclusive owner of the Rose Bowl Game trademark and owns the mark for use in connection with the annual game.

article thumbnail

copying/explicit references let Roblox proceed with dubious (c) claim; Lego should be watching

43(B)log

Defendants allegedly marketed the My Avastars dolls with a “code” that could be used in the Roblox platform. The court also found that the alleged use of the Roblox name was not, as a matter of law, nominative fair use. This was enough survive the motion to dismiss.

Copying 94
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

What legal lines can’t NFTs cross? The Nike v StockX lawsuit may provide answers

IPilogue

sued StockX LLC for trademark infringement, false designation of origin, trademark dilution, and related causes. This case has the potential to define the scope of trademark rights against unauthorized uses in the world of NFTs. On February 3 rd 2022 Nike Inc. The Nike Suit. StockX Vault NFTs. Recent Developments.

article thumbnail

WIPIP 2022, session 1 (trademark)

43(B)log

Lolita Darden, Stopping Zombie Company Trademark Abuse and Consumer Deception in Trademark Abandonment Cases Based on clinic work. b/c standard for proving abandonment is not consistent through US. A: False advertising context: FTC/state AGs. Protectability doctrines take this into account as well as fair use.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

We’ve tried to represent a diversity of subject matter also in this list, so it’s a mixed bag of cases dealing with patents, trademarks, copyright law etc. The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals.

IP 124
article thumbnail

IPSC Opening Plenary Session

43(B)log

Matthew Sag, Copyright Safety for Generative AI Not addressing whether training is always fair use in every circumstance; explain how generative AI fits w/in existing law (nonexpressive uses) and identify best practices to make generative AI fairer. Implications: too much memorization undermines arguments in favor of fair use.

article thumbnail

USC IP year in review, TM/ROP

43(B)log

Begin with legislative action: Trademark Modernization Act, Which introduces three of the big themes of the year: (1) trademark use, (2) the harm of infringement, and (3) the role of the First Amendment in limiting the scope of trademark rights. Slides here.

IP 94