Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 25, 2023
After he was released from jail, he got copyright registrations for the photos and sued (pro se) the media entities for copyright infringement, 1202 violations, and more. The court held that the photographer, and not the group or other members, held the copyright, so the group’s posting of the photos to social media could infringe.
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 2, 2022
While Barlow & Bear may now try to argue that their work constitutes fair use, it’s a weak defense in this case. The Musical Parody ,” “The Unofficial Bridgerton Musical” isn’t the type of parody musical that courts have often found to be fair use under the Copyright Act.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
JIPEL Copyright Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
The museum industry, it would seem, is taking note of technology’s growing role in its operations, particularly in regards to visitor engagement and staying relevant in a social media-driven society where declining visitation rates have only been exacerbated by the ongoing pandemic.
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 22, 2022
Designed to be freely available licensed or public domain; we occasionally use fair use images where no free image is available, such as when a famous work has been destroyed. Not only are some services different from social media, one social media platform may differ very much from each other.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
The court also credits the self-serving claim by the successor licensee that it considered fair use by comparing the works and evaluating if the works were being sold commercially or for other purposes. New Destiny Church. * ‘Reaction’ Video Protected By Fair Use–Hosseinzadeh v. Federici. * Biosafe-One v.
Copyright Lately
APRIL 3, 2023
The future of “controlled digital lending” is in doubt after a court rules that the Internet Archive’s online library is not protected by fair use. IA’s Open Library project includes millions of public domain books that users can download and read without restriction. It also includes 3.6
43(B)log
FEBRUARY 19, 2022
While Rogers rejected any consideration of whether the speaker had adequate alternatives to using the plaintiff’s trademark because speakers are entitled to choose their own ways of speaking, the religious cases embrace the concept of adequate alternatives. What do we do with that? What to do next?
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
124 
Let's personalize your content