This site uses cookies to improve your experience. By viewing our content, you are accepting the use of cookies. To help us insure we adhere to various privacy regulations, please select your country/region of residence. If you do not select a country we will assume you are from the United States. View our privacy policy and terms of use.

Remove firms dunlap-bennett
article thumbnail

Sufficient Evidence of Defendant Involvement Required to Obtain Preliminary Injunction Against Cyber Hacking

JD Supra Law

MARCH 11, 2022

March 7, 2022 – Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC, a veteran owned law firm, gave the winning argument in Mycroft AI v. By: Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig PLLC Tumey, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eight Circuit on March 4, 2022.

Law 98
Law Patent 98
article thumbnail

DECEMBER 2021 RETAIL PATENT LITIGATION REPORT

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 6, 2022

Cnsl: Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. Cnsl: Devlin Law Firm. Cascades Branding Innovation LLC v. Aldi, Inc (N.D. Judge: Magistrate Judge Mary M. Claims: Infringement. Defendant: ALDI, Inc. Plaintiff: Cascades Branding Innovation LLC. Patents: 7,768,395 (Brand mapping); 8,106,766 (Brand mapping); 8,405,504 (Brand mapping).

Reporting 52
Reporting Litigation Patent Branding 52
article thumbnail

DECEMEBR 2021 RETAIL PATENT LITIGATION REPORT

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 6, 2022

Cnsl: Dunlap Bennett & Ludwig. Cnsl: Devlin Law Firm. Cascades Branding Innovation LLC v. Aldi, Inc (N.D. Judge: Magistrate Judge Mary M. Claims: Infringement. Defendant: ALDI, Inc. Plaintiff: Cascades Branding Innovation LLC. Patents: 7,768,395 (Brand mapping); 8,106,766 (Brand mapping); 8,405,504 (Brand mapping).

Reporting 52
Reporting Litigation Patent Branding 52
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

 

Stay Connected

Join 9,000+ Insiders by signing up for our newsletter

About
About
Editions
Editions
Topics
Powered by Aggregage | Terms and Conditions | Your California Rights and Privacy Policy
© Aggregage 2024