JD Supra Law

DECEMBER 21, 2021

dismissed with prejudice a pro se plaintiff’s claim that the law firm Bracewell LLP induced infringement of his patent by providing legal advice to a direct infringer. By: Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP On December 10, 2021, Judge Katherine Polk Failla (S.D.N.Y.) See Ottah v. Bracewell LLP, No.

Law 52

Law Patent 52

IP Law 360

JANUARY 20, 2023

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP won more than $2 billion for a software company that had its trade secrets stolen, prevented a generic version of Janssen's schizophrenia drug Invega Sustenna and cracked down on counterfeit surgical devices, earning the firm a place among Law360's 2022 Intellectual Property Groups of the Year.

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property IP 40

JD Supra Law

OCTOBER 20, 2021

Last month, we wrote a post on the patent “aggregation” suit Intel had filed against various entities affiliated with the investment firm Fortress. By: Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP The post was timely; the next day, Judge Chen granted Fortress’s motion to dismiss with prejudice and entered judgment for the defendants.

Patent 52

Patent 52