Remove topics aiding-and-abetting
article thumbnail

The Internet Survives SCOTUS Review (This Time)–Twitter v. Taamneh and Gonzalez v. Google

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Between the two decisions, we get a powerful opinion on the topic of “aiding and abetting” online, while Section 230 dodged its first SCOTUS review. The Supreme Court says that the term “aiding and abetting” in the statute should be interpreted using the common law. Supreme Court [FN].

article thumbnail

Judge Goes Rogue and Rejects Snap’s Section 230 Defense for [Reasons]–Neville v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

The plaintiffs are parents of Snapchat users who purchased fentanyl from other Snapchat users and suffered overdoses. They sued Snapchat for a wide ranges of tort claims. To get around the clear Section 230 barrier to those claims, the plaintiffs attempted the now-standard Lemmon v. ”) as a defective product. The venerable Barrett v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

A Roundup of German Caselaw Regarding Emojis and Emoticons (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Although the number of published cases reporting factual information about emoji was in the single digits until just recently, and German courts have yet to develop a standard method of dealing with them, the topic is growing rapidly even though courts have some trepidation about it. Introduction. Hesitation to display emoji in opinions.

article thumbnail

Catching Up on Recent FOSTA Developments (None of Them Good)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Students: this post surfaces numerous potential paper topics. The number #1 question I get whenever I discuss FOSTA with folks who aren’t familiar with it: did Congress know what it was doing? Well, the answer is complicated. For more background, read my primer about FOSTA and 230. THE MINDGEEK LITIGATION. Ruling #1: Doe v. Section 230.

Blogging 120