Remove topics arbitrary-marks
article thumbnail

Fanciful Trademark: A Comprehensive Explanation

LexBlog IP

Generally, there are four times of trademarks: Fanciful or Arbitrary. Interestingly, the courts lump together fanciful trademarks with “arbitrary” trademarks with respect to strength. In addition, fanciful marks are more likely to obtain trademark registration (i.e., Fanciful Versus Arbitrary Trademarks.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

SpicyIP

In this month’s edition, he looks into topics including the Plant Variety Registry, different tales of/ takes on personality rights, and multiple leaks of key documents and their contribution in law-making. Case Summaries M/s Blue Heaven Cosmetics Pvt. Koninklijke Philips N.V. vs Oplus Mobitech India Pvt.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Supreme Court of China casted punitive damages upon post-settlement-agreement repeated patent infringement

The IPKat

In that regard, punitive damages for IPRs infringements have found their places in, but not limited to, China’s Civil Code (CCC), Copyright Law, Trade Mark Law and Patent Law (see former IPKat posts here and here ). For those who are interested in this topic, the chapter might be a fun read. of the PD Interpretation.

article thumbnail

Full Of Sound And Query, Signifying Something: Recent Noise Over Acoustic Trademarks

LexBlog IP

I start with MGM and Penn State, not because MGM’s registered trademark and Penn State’s common law one are at odds, but because they are two well-known acoustic, or sound (or auditory), marks that can help us understand those sounding off recently about such non-traditional trademarks.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (June 28 – July 4)

SpicyIP

Topical Highlight. She notes that judges in these cases can also pass unreasonable orders, for instance, a ban on production in a particular country based on some unreasonable arguments is unfair and arbitrary. The defendant submitted to the decree of the Court to be restrained permanently from infringing the plaintiff’s impugned mark.