Remove topics cease-and-desist-orders
article thumbnail

Major Record Labels Sue Youtube-dl’s Hosting Provider

TorrentFreak

Law firm Rasch works with several major music industry players and it was on their behalf that cease-and-desist orders were sent to local hosting service Uberspace. Nevertheless, GitHub later restored the software and placed $1m in a takedown defense fund. Threats Were Also Sent to Others.

article thumbnail

Practice Tips for Combating Counterfeiters: An Action Plan for Brands, Manufacturers and Retailers

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Even if an identical trademark is not used, a knock-off product may infringe trade dress or patent rights where it is made to copy the protected appearance, details and construction of a well-known product in order to mislead consumers as to the source of the product.

Branding 147
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Copyright Concerns When Using Others to Create Content

Erik K Pelton

The second issue I’m seeing come up more and more, where copyright cease and desist letters are received and someone says, “Well, I hired someone to do my newsletter, or do a blog post, or do the social media, and I wasn’t aware of where they got the content from.” First, contracts. What do you mean?

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Tidbits – Natco’s Request to Vacate Ceritinib Interim Injunction Rejected, Madras High Court Revokes Omega Ecotech’s Patent, and Delhi High Court Upholds IPO’s Patent Rejection

SpicyIP

In the last few days, the Madras and Delhi High Courts have passed a few significant orders on these topics. Let’s take a look at these three orders in this quick tidbit. Image from here Refuse: (1) to vacate an interim injunction, (2) to remand back to the patent office, and (3) to continue allowance of a patent grant!

Patent 45
article thumbnail

You’re a Fool if You Think You Can Win a 512(f) Case–Security Police and Fire Professionals v. Maritas

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

This ruling covers two key topics related to 512. Today is April Fool’s day, and longtime readers know that I do not participate in gags that undermine my credibility as a blogger. I’m going to focus on the 512(f) claim. ” it didn’t specify the precise location of the infringing works. ” Cite to ISE v.

Fair Use 101
article thumbnail

Swedish court applies C-762/19 CV-Online Latvia in parking app battle

The IPKat

Why having seven different apps for ordering takeout if you can aggregate all that sushi into one app? For more content aggregated on the topic of CV-Online Latvia, see here. Here’s what Hans writes: Thankfully Kitty found a place where to park her car Content and service aggregation is big business in 2022.

article thumbnail

ITC Litigation: Introduction to Trade Secret Protection at the ITC

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

We have covered several introductory topics about 337 Investigations at the International Trade Commission (ITC) through the lens of its most common context [1] —as another forum for patent litigation. [2] This is achieved through an exclusion order , which is typically “limited”, i.e. , applying only to the named respondent. [6]