Remove topics inflation-adjustments
article thumbnail

Unpacking IDC v Lenovo (Part IV): top-down cross check; allegations regarding conduct; permission to appeal

The IPKat

The main reason is that InterDigital argued that the top-down analysis supported the rates in their 5G Extended Offer, and the Judge had founded those rates to be inflated and discriminatory ([881]; see also the Judge’s conclusion in [873]). Then it moved on to the inevitable topic of appeal.

article thumbnail

Taking IP “Rights” Too Seriously – A Look Through History

SpicyIP

But in the era of right-inflation where everything is understood as ‘right’, they appear conflicting, and ultimately are balanced out by each other! . Ultimately, the countries and their needs should decide what their users’ interests are and how copyright should be adjusted within/according to them, as some Countries claimed in 1967.

IP 138
article thumbnail

U.S. Supreme Court Vindicates Photographer But Destabilizes Fair Use — Andy Warhol Foundation v. Goldsmith (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

Barton Beebe’s empirical work on this topic. That amount should be adjusted upward for inflation, and for the fact that Goldsmith’s own reputation as a celebrity photographer has grown over the years. Before 2020, the Supreme Court decided only four fair use cases. In the first, Sony Corp. of America v.