Remove topics interlocutory-injunctions
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 25- December 31)

SpicyIP

December 26, 2023(Delhi High Court) The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants’ trademark ‘GK WELLNESS’ and their logos, infringe the plaintiffs’ trademark ‘GK HAIR’ and sought an interlocutory injunction against the use. The Court, stating that there could be no monopoly over ideas, refused to grant the injunction.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 13- May 19) 

SpicyIP

As always, the topic is open ended, so long as it is related to IP law. SpicyIP Tidbit: Delhi High Court grants an Ex-parte Ad interim Injunction to Designer Gaurav Gupta On DHC’s recent interim injunction to designer Gaurav Gupta, Surabhi highlights the problem with the Court’s one glove fits all approach in this tidbit.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2021

SpicyIP

This year, we have divided these developments into three categories: a) Top 10 IP Judgments/Orders (Topicality/Impact). Top 10 Judgments/Orders [Topicality/Impact]. Cipla had filed for a permanent injunction against Sun Pharmaceuticals for selling deceptively similar goods bearing the mark ‘Respule’. H Lundbeck A/S v.

IP 143