The IPKat

JULY 5, 2021

In summary, they concerned, first, whether the patent owner is obliged to offer a licence to component suppliers and, second, how rigidly the CJEU framework in Huawei v ZTE ( Case C-170/13 ) should be applied. The two questions referred were multi-faceted and can be read in full here (PDF).

Licensing 52

Licensing Settlement IP Social Media 52

SpicyIP

JULY 5, 2021

Topical Highlight. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Delhi in ZTE Corporation, Gurgaon v. Delhi High Court Clarifies Law on Arbitrability of Trademark Disputes. Golden Tobacco Ltd. He notes that the Court considered this dispute concerning the breach of a trademark licensing agreement as arbitrable and referred it to arbitration.

Intellectual Property 105

Intellectual Property Trademark Licensing Copyright 105

The IPKat

SEPTEMBER 12, 2021

Purr-haps a good topic for a dissertation. Merpel wonders how that squares with the quasi-policing of non-UK patents in other areas of patent law, such as in the determination of global FRAND licences. Is there a unifying philosophy as to the role of the UK courts in extraterritorial patent concerns?

Litigation 98

Litigation Patent Marketing Marketing 98

LexBlog IP

APRIL 3, 2023

This decision addresses many hot topics in licensing SEPs and attempts to harmonize existing decisions in reaching its rulings here.The Court here, for example, discussed the following topics: There is some dispute about whether a FRAND commitment imposes obligations on someone wanting to license an SEP. Huawei , and the U.S.

Licensing 52

Licensing Technology Intellectual Property Patent 52