Remove toyota-standard-work-part-2
article thumbnail

Spill the Tee M: Discussing the Delhi High Court’s Order on Transborder Reputation in Toyota v TechSquare

SpicyIP

In December 2017, the Apex Court in Toyota v Prius Auto Industries, set the standard of claiming transnational reputation in a mark backed by adequate evidence. Interestingly, Toyota does not use the Alphard mark in India, but instead sells the same vehicle under the name ‘Vellfire’. Image from here.

article thumbnail

A Look Back at India’s Top IP Developments of 2023

SpicyIP

The Court interpreted the clause on ownership of work made during a contract of service (Section 17(c)) to not apply in situations where there is a contract between equals. CCI order, one against the Monsanto order, and another appeal against the 2 015 Ericsson v. While delineating the rights of the parties, the Court held that R.D

IP 124
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Fish Principals Author Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal Article, “Strategic IP Considerations of Batteries and Energy Storage Solutions”

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

2 Factors influencing this growth include falling costs for components, strong demand for portable electronics, and increasingly strict emissions standards among developed nations. See Figure 2 for global production of lithium-ion cells by usage. Figure 2: Global Production of Lithium-Ion Cells by Usage 3. Valued at $108.4

article thumbnail

Resolving Conflicts Between Trademark and Free Speech Rights After Jack Daniel’s v. VIP Products (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

If another’s mark is used within the title or content of an expressive work, the Rogers test prevents a finding of infringement under 15 U.S.C. While there are problems with certain parts of the decision, including the Court’s ruling on the dilution claim, much of the language in the decision is speech-protective. 1114(1) or 15 U.S.C.