LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] It found that all four fair use factors weighed against fair use. [12] Goldsmith counterclaimed for copyright infringement.
IP and Legal Filings
JUNE 12, 2023
In relation to ‘Parodies’, since it is derived from the original work of another writer or artist, it is difficult to draw a line between creative criticism and imitation. Since copying was for the purpose of criticism, it amounted to fair dealing and did not constitute infringement of the copyright.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
IIPRD
AUGUST 11, 2023
There is no question of fair use as although it is not commercially beneficial but it is neither limited to private use. This makes it difficult for the creator to control the dissemination of their works. For content piracy, Takeshobo Inc., Napster, Inc., 3d 1004, 1021, 1022 (2001). [3] 4] Star India v.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
A third reflection emerges: undoubtedly, Warhol’s work was created based on Goldsmith’s. However, it is important to recognize that all artistic works are influenced by those that came before them. [1] 3] Regardless of the creative level of a work, copyright comes with limitations. 37, 2018). [3]
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
97 
Let's personalize your content