Remove 2005 Remove Advertising Remove Confidentiality Remove Privacy
article thumbnail

Journey Through “Octobers” on SpicyIP (2005 – Present) 

SpicyIP

Xiaomi highlighting how the common practice of courts granting confidentiality in commercial litigation problematizes transparency, judicial accountability, and the citizens’ right to be informed of court processes and reasoning under Article 19(1)(a). Only then does Google need to take action against the advertisement and not otherwise.

article thumbnail

The Copyright Quandary regarding the Delhi High Court Rules on Live-streaming of Court Proceedings

SpicyIP

Supreme Court of India , which dealt with issues of confidentiality, privacy (prior consent) of litigants and witnesses, restrictions on access to proceedings of trials and the preservation of the larger public interest due to the sensitivity of the proceedings. These are based on the principles set forth in Swapnil Tripathi v.

Copyright 136
article thumbnail

WIPIP 2022, Session 3 (ROP/TM, (c) fair use)

43(B)log

Industries: advertising, merchandising, movies/TV, and video games. Even where permission not legally required, thought was better results due to advances in technology—social media influencing: the advertiser wants customized content. A: contracts were confidential but may be able to talk about standard terms. Accolade, Sony v.