SpicyIP

FEBRUARY 9, 2023

Supreme Court of India , which dealt with issues of confidentiality, privacy (prior consent) of litigants and witnesses, restrictions on access to proceedings of trials and the preservation of the larger public interest due to the sensitivity of the proceedings. These are based on the principles set forth in Swapnil Tripathi v.

Copyright 136

Copyright Government Law Editing 136

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 19, 2021

After the Patent Amendment Act 2005, patent protection for food, pharma and chemical inventions is possible but this concept not very popular in India. The claim of the applicant should not be the one existing in the public domain at the date of filing of an application. The answer is yes. Conclusion.

Patent 40

Patent Invention Public Domain Patent Application 40

IP Whiteboard

APRIL 15, 2021

The contents of the Letter were not private or confidential, and there was no reasonable expectation of privacy. Any privacy interest that did exist was slight, and was outweighed by the need to protect the rights of Meghan’s father and the public at large. The defendant raised a number of arguments, including that: [19]. 1] [link]. [2]

Privacy 40

Privacy Copyright Publishing Law 40