Kashishipr

SEPTEMBER 20, 2021

Under Section 2(c) of The Copyright Act of 1957 , the label is an original artistic work. In May 2007, the label mark ‘SOYA DROP’ was registered. As per NTC’s statement, both SSPL and SK Oil Industries couldn’t claim copyright in the artistic work. For more visit: [link].

Registration 98

Registration Artistic Work Copyright Registering Trademarks 98

IP and Legal Filings

AUGUST 14, 2023

Choice Of Law In Ipr Infringement The nature of the rights is the primary concern in any international dispute that involves intellectual property rights.

Copyright Infringement 52

Copyright Infringement Law Copyright Intellectual Property 52

IIPRD

OCTOBER 28, 2023

She trademarked the term in February 2007, and since then, it has become her “signature catchphrase.” Therefore, the same cannot be protected under Indian Copyright law as a literary or artistic work but could be protected under passing off law if a case is made for it. v] 2007 (34) PTC 164 (Karnataka). [vi] 541 of 2019.

Copyright Law 59

Copyright Law Branding Brands Branding 59

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 28, 2024

1] The Copyright Act protects certain types of works, which are included in Section 13. 13 (1) states that original literary, dramatic, musical, and artistic works as well as cinematograph films and sound recordings are protected by copyright. Sholay Media and Entertainment Pvt. Mondaq (Dec.

Cinema 80

Cinema Copyright Blogging Registration 80

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 30, 2022

Copyright is a crucial right endowed to the formers of any artistic work, it needs to be protected by a process named ‘copyright violation’ which encroaches upon the exclusive rights given to the copyright holder. Copyright violation refers to when an unauthorized user infringes the original work of another individual.

Copyright 60

Copyright Branding Brands Branding 60

Intellectual Property Law Blog

JUNE 16, 2023

The Supreme Court recounted the facts and reasoning underlying Rogers that “the titles of ‘artistic works,’ like the works themselves, have an ‘expressive element’ implicating ‘First Amendment values.’ [11] 58 (2007)). [14] 1125(c)(3)(A). Grimaldi, 875 F. 2d at 998). [12] 12] 599 U.S. 2023) (slip op., at 11-12). [13]

Fair Use 130

Fair Use Trademark Cease and Desist Designs 130

LexBlog IP

JUNE 16, 2023

” The Supreme Court recounted the facts and reasoning underlying Rogers that “the titles of ‘artistic works,’ like the works themselves, have an ‘expressive element’ implicating ‘First Amendment values.’ 58 (2007)). [14] ’ §1125(c)(3)(A). Grimaldi, 875 F.

Fair Use 52

Fair Use Cease and Desist Trademark Designs 52