Remove 2007 Remove Branding Remove Copying Remove Ownership
article thumbnail

Precedential No. 18: TTAB Orders Cancellation of Two Registrations Under Section 14(3) Due to Registrant's Misrepresentation of Source

The TTABlog

Otto Kern GmbH , 83 USPQ2d 1861, 1863 (TTAB 2007). Coca-Cola submitted evidence of its ownership of the marks THUMS UP and LIMCA in India for soft drinks, where the marks are well known. The respondent’s use must be a “blatant misuse of the mark … in a manner calculated to trade on the goodwill and reputation of petitioner.”

article thumbnail

Despite likely confusion and presumption of irreparable harm, delay dooms old USFL's PI bid

43(B)log

He also hosted a reunion and golf tournament in 2007 and engaged in other referential activities; he managed royalties from the licensed USFL apparel from 2011-2021. American Classics responded by sending a copy of the License Agreement between American Classics and Ehrhart, and other records relating to the royalty payments. “In

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Web Scraping and Intellectual Property Rights

IIPRD

Data scraping majorly involves the copying of data from a source; therefore the Copyright laws come into the picture. 1] ‘ Web scraping: A new hero that defends brands and intellectual property , AndriusPalionis, TechRadar. [2] Modak & Anr on 12 December 2007. [4] References]. [1] 2] The Copyright Act, 1957.—Section

article thumbnail

Customs Intervention for IP in the Indian Sub-Continent

Kashishipr

The Intellectual Property Rights (Imported Goods) Enforcement Rules, 2007 and The Customs Act, 1962 form the legal basis for Customs Recordal of IPRs in India. Hard copies of the documents uploaded in the online application are sent along with the UTRN to the Customs Office. A copy of the order shall be conveyed to the rights holder.

IP 105
article thumbnail

WIPIP, Concurrent Session #1, Design

43(B)log

The claim is authenticity: authorized manufacturers and retailers; they call copies counterfeits. When Design Within Reach started, it said in its 2007 10K: “our competitors believe they have exclusive rights” in some of their proudcts, including some of their best selling items, which were reproductions. the design itself?

Designs 59
article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Tools for Protecting Fashion Goods

LexBlog IP

In the event that infringement occurs, a designer must show that the infringer copied the designers copyrighted work. [5] Fashion companies should be aware that they may need to obtain a license to, or ownership of, the copyright from the photographer. § 102(a); see also Pride Family Brands, Inc. 1] 17 U.S.C. §

article thumbnail

Intellectual Property Tools for Protecting Fashion Goods

Above the Fold

In the event that infringement occurs, a designer must show that the infringer copied the designers copyrighted work. [5] Fashion companies should be aware that they may need to obtain a license to, or ownership of, the copyright from the photographer. 102(a); see also Pride Family Brands, Inc. Peters , 488 F.3d 3d 277 (4th Cir.