article thumbnail

Why the Golden Bear is Actually Going to Court: Nicklaus Company v Jack Nicklaus

IPilogue

In May 2007, before the concept of name, image, and likeness became popularized by the USA’s NCAA ruling for college athletes, Nicklaus appears to have made a similar deal except it was for “exclusive rights to valuable intellectual property and services”. This agreement involved three parties: 1) Jack Nicklaus; 2) GBI Investors Inc.;

Contracts 119
article thumbnail

Global Digital Encounter 21: The Metaverse as a Challenge to Classical IP

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Dr Guadamuz felt that the 2007 discussions were being reopened again. Then, there is a second version of property ownership, as seen in the Second Life – virtual goods created by users, which belong to them. NFTs could potentially enable ownership but this is yet to be seen. Courts understand the environment. Conclusion.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 18: TTAB Orders Cancellation of Two Registrations Under Section 14(3) Due to Registrant's Misrepresentation of Source

The TTABlog

Otto Kern GmbH , 83 USPQ2d 1861, 1863 (TTAB 2007). Coca-Cola submitted evidence of its ownership of the marks THUMS UP and LIMCA in India for soft drinks, where the marks are well known. The respondent’s use must be a “blatant misuse of the mark … in a manner calculated to trade on the goodwill and reputation of petitioner.”

article thumbnail

Despite likely confusion and presumption of irreparable harm, delay dooms old USFL's PI bid

43(B)log

He also hosted a reunion and golf tournament in 2007 and engaged in other referential activities; he managed royalties from the licensed USFL apparel from 2011-2021. Once abandoned, Mr. Ehrhart could establish ownership through use of the Marks.” Third parties have also invested “considerable resources in the New League.”

article thumbnail

A General Analysis on Mergers And Acquisitions

IP and Legal Filings

Certain benefits can be listed as: Gaining recognition and global brands. But despite the acquisition of Myntra by flipkart and flipkart having 100% ownership over it, Myntra still operates as a separate entity in the market. Tata Steel in 2007 purchased Corus which is a European based steel company for 12.02 Case Study.

article thumbnail

Web Scraping and Intellectual Property Rights

IIPRD

1] ‘ Web scraping: A new hero that defends brands and intellectual property , AndriusPalionis, TechRadar. [2] Modak & Anr on 12 December 2007. [4] Another remedy could be that the work in question is being used for a non-commercial purpose or that it falls under Section 52 of the Copyright Act [4]. References]. [1]

article thumbnail

TTAB Orders Cancellation of FREEDOM PARTY Registration: Application Was Void Ab Initio Due to Nonownership

The TTABlog

Petitioners alleged that from 2003 to October 2016, Petitioners and Respondent operated as a partnership and shared equally the profits derived from arranging and organizing dance parties in New York City under the Freedom Party brand. See Great Seats , 84 USPQ2d at 1239 9TTAB 2007).