article thumbnail

Alleged Co-Inventor Not Bringing Home the Bacon This Time

The IP Law Blog

Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). Unitherm”), argued that it had rights to the patent because its president was an inventor and should be added to the patent.

Inventor 110
article thumbnail

Alleged Co-Inventor Not Bringing Home the Bacon This Time

LexBlog IP

Well, it turns out that not all contributions count when it comes to being an inventor of a patent for a better method of precooking bacon. 9,980,498 (the “’498 Patent”). The ‘498 Patent is directed to a two-step process for cooking bacon pieces. Also, Howard was not named as an inventor.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Bacon and a Heavy Burden: Significant Contribution Required To Be a Joint Inventor

LexBlog IP

to have David Howard added as an inventor to Hormel’s U.S. 9,980,498 (Bacon Patent) were recently scorched by the Federal Circuit. In 2007, Unitherm Food Systems (HIP’s predecessor) entered into a joint development agreement with Hormel to develop an oven that would be used in this two-step cooking process. Efforts by HIP, Inc.

article thumbnail

Enablement Requirements For Patents in India

Intepat

However, even after fulfilling these requirements, an additional requirement is to be fulfilled by the inventor/applicant and that is of ‘enablement’. A related concept to the enablement requirement is that of the ‘best mode’ requirement. Also, in the case of Tata Global Beverages Limited v.

Patent 98
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Overrules Rosen-Durling Test for Design Patent Obviousness

Patently-O

Rejecting the argument that KSR did not implicate design patent obviousness, the court reasoned that 35 U.S.C. § 103 “applies to all types of patents” and the text does not “differentiate” between design and utility patents.

article thumbnail

Problem Statement Precision: A Key Factor in TSM-Based Non-Obviousness Determination?

SpicyIP

Background The appellant (Microsoft) filed a patent application on 27 February 2012 for an invention titled “Message Communication of Sensor and other Data.” ” The invention aimed to simplify the communication of sensor data to applications by converting raw sensor data into lightweight messages.

Invention 111
article thumbnail

Enablement Requirements For Patents in India

Intepat

However, even after fulfilling these requirements, an additional requirement is to be fulfilled by the inventor/applicant, and that is ‘enablement.’ At the same time, the best mode criterion is a subjective and factual inquiry pertinent to the state of the inventor’s mind. In the patent application 00094/C.A.L./2002,

Patent 52