article thumbnail

[Guest post] Artificial Intelligence and (hopefully) the death of copyright

The IPKat

340 (1991) , Case C-5/08, Infopaq (2009) , Eastern Book v. So, there is no literal and non-literal copying of a work. The only thing that matters is what you have created, and we will protect you if others copy your creation. If someone invades your privacy, you can enforce your personality rights. Rural, 499 U.S.

Copyright 138
article thumbnail

IP Issues in The World of Japanese Sequential Art – Manga

IIPRD

IP ISSUES CREATED BY THE MANGA FAN BASE Due to the growing interest of the world inMangas several rights of a manga-ka are challenged. Donjinshiisa self-published fan bookthatuses the existing manga characters violating the personality rights of the characters as was established in the famous caseof V.T. 19, 2011, 2009 (A) No.

Art 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Traditional Tattoos on the Red Carpet: Continuing the Conversation of Collective Ownership

IPilogue

In 2009, the Hudson’s Bay Company (HBC) mass-produced sweaters as part of their official merchandise for the 2010 Vancouver Olympics. In 2009, the Belgian Court of Appeal was tasked with deciding whether a tattoo could be granted ownership under Belgian copyright law in JDH v JM. The United States has also ruled on the issue.

Ownership 103
article thumbnail

Right of Publicity Part 2

IP and Legal Filings

JIPS 88 Indian Performing Right Society vs Eastern India Motion Pictures 1977 SCR (3) 206 Raja Pocket Books vs Radha Pocket Books 1997 (40) DRJ 791 M. OS) 1745/2009 Rajagopal and Ors. Entertainment Pvt. vs. Baby Gift House and Ors.MANU/DE/2043/2010 ArunJaitley v. Network Solutions (P) Ltd.CS(OS) Puttaswamy (retd.)

Privacy 98