Plagiarism Today
SEPTEMBER 28, 2021
I understand a lot of you may be upset that I saw a photo on social media and loved it enough to imitate it in a very different style. ” The case raises questions of fair use and whether the new paintings were transformative enough to be non-infringing or if they were simply derivative works.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 27, 2022
First, governments can never successfully operate a social media service. Of course, mobs, riots, rebellions, pogroms, lynchings, and other coordinated killings have taken place throughout human history, well before social media existed. social media has played an outsized role in finding and prosecuting the insurrection.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright Lately
MAY 17, 2021
And putting aside its pure entertainment value, the sketch also raises some interesting questions about just how much of an original work may be taken before parodic fair use crosses the line into copyright infringement. Jason Segel and the Muppets on SNL (2011). The Supreme Court’s seminal fair use decision, Campbell v.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JANUARY 24, 2023
On the heels of the mandatory editorial transparency provisions in Florida and Texas’ social media censorship laws, the California legislature thought it could one-up those states by passing a law with at least 161 different disclosure requirements. The opinion upheld every aspect of Texas’ social media censorship law.
IP and Legal Filings
JANUARY 13, 2023
De minimis in copyright can be used for different reasons such as for fair use analysis, substantial similarity analysis [7] , among its other such uses. Chintamani Rao and Ors, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 4712. Chintamani Rao and Ors, 2011 SCC OnLine Del 4712. [4] Viacom 18 Motion Picture & Ors [6].,
IP and Legal Filings
APRIL 19, 2022
Temporary or incidental storage of work or performance to provide electronic links, access, or integration, where the owner has not expressly prohibited such links, access, or integration, falls under the ambit of fair use of copyright, according to Section 52(1)(c) of the Indian Copyright Act, 1957.
Copyright Lately
OCTOBER 25, 2021
The judge rejected BMG’s fair use defense, holding that the defendants took more elements from the “Nightmare on Elm” street films than they needed to accomplish any parodic purpose. “The Cabin in the Woods” (2011). Beyond that, the overall stories were quite different. Happy Halloween!
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
240 
Let's personalize your content