IP and Legal Filings
JANUARY 30, 2022
The Respondent secured federal trademark registration for “Get Lucky” in 1986, and the Petitioner commenced offering garments employing the registered trademark “Lucky Brand” and term “Lucky” a few years later, in 1990. This case saw the issuance of several marks.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
AUGUST 30, 2023
The plaintiff has a trademark registration for the “Nursing CE Central” mark for providing continuing education for nurses. A rival, Colibri, displayed in the trademark in its Google keyword ads, but it claims it has stopped doing so after the lawsuit was filed. ” Actual confused. “Undetermined.” Not relevant.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
JULY 25, 2021
Aliign “is an event, lifestyle, and apparel company” allegedly with a first trademark use in 2011. Aliign sued lululemon for trademark infringement. Want to Engage in Anti-Competitive Trademark Bullying? Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless….
SpicyIP
SEPTEMBER 18, 2023
We are pleased to bring to you a guest post by Roshan Santhalia ruminating on the question of whether a cease-and-desist notice before instituting a trademark or copyright infringement suit should be issued or not. Hons) LLB from NALSAR, Hyderabad in 2011 and MSc from Oxford, UK in 2012. Cease and desist by Nick Youngson CC BY-SA 3.0
43(B)log
JUNE 20, 2022
Laches can bar both injunctive relief and damages in trademark cases, and here the court grants a motion to dismiss based on laches. Defendants, also based in New York formed their own Darkside in 2011, featuring an electronic, psychedelic musical style; their first album was self-titled. And the complaint conceded just that.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
JULY 11, 2022
2011) the “arbitrability of IPR disputes” was the subject of a notable ruling by the Hon. 2011 in relation to the personam problem arising out of rights in rem. The jurisdiction of the arbitral tribunal is not affected by the Trademarks Act or the Copyright Act. Arbitration in Intellectual Property. Supreme Court.
43(B)log
JANUARY 5, 2024
In 2011, Plaintiff sued defendants for using the marks “Florida Virtual Academy/Program” and the associated acronyms, “FLVA/P.” Plaintiff has seven registered trademarks involving Florida Virtual School or FLVS; two of the registrations are incontestable. But trademark confusion? statements as evidence of confusion.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
95 
Let's personalize your content