Remove 2014 Remove Artwork Remove Invention Remove Inventor
article thumbnail

IP Protection for Artificial Intelligence

LexBlog IP

Many recall a famous 2014 case where monkeys got ahold of a photographer’s camera and snapped a number of selfies. Vidal held “We, too, conclude that the Patent Act requires an ‘inventor’ to be a natural person.” Copyright law requires the authoring of a creative work that is fixed in a tangible medium.

IP 52
article thumbnail

AI and copyright in 2022

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AI-generated works have won awards: The Crow , an “AI-made” film won the Jury Award at the Cannes Short Film Festival and the story of an AI artwork winning the Colorado State Fair’s annual art competition was reported in The New York Times. And, of course, the debate on computer-generated inventions rumbled on across the world.)

Copyright 145
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

National IPR Policy : An Analysis

IP and Legal Filings

Intellectual Property Right The rights and privileges accorded to persons over their creative works, such as innovations, works of literature, and artwork, as well as use of names, logos and pictures in trade are known as intellectual property rights (IPR). iii] Bayer Corporation vs. Union of India 2014 (60) PTC 277 (Bom). [iv]

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

SpicyIP

From an in-depth discussion on the terms of copyright and translations in India to the recent UK Supreme Court’s order regarding the patentability of inventions by an AI, we had some engaging posts on this blog this week. The Court directed the NBA to determine whether the invention relates to biological resource with a reasoned order.