The IPKat

NOVEMBER 14, 2022

a wise cat that care about environment kindly provided in CC0 Public Domain license by Pixhere.com) Having to make a selection among the many topics covered, this GuestKat finds it interesting to note that during the conference the EPO case G2/21 on 'plausibility', was repeatedly discussed from different angles. (a

IP 76

IP Marketing Marketing Confidentiality 76

IP and Legal Filings

JUNE 27, 2022

These are protected under the Designs Act, 2000, corresponding to Design (Amendment) Rules, 2014. TRADE SECRETS: Any set of information which is confidential and is necessary for the commerce of that business since they include potential commercial value and is not in public domain qualifies to be a trade secret.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Moral Rights Designs Design 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MAY 7, 2021

Just like other patents, the patent protection on Blockchain also achieves exclusive rights to its inventor or assignee in exchange of details about the blockchain invented to be released in the public domain. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.

Technology 52

Technology Patent IP Invention 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MAY 7, 2021

Just like other patents, the patent protection on Blockchain also achieves exclusive rights to its inventor or assignee in exchange of details about the blockchain invented to be released in the public domain. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.

Technology 52

Technology Patent IP Invention 52

Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog

MAY 7, 2021

Just like other patents, the patent protection on Blockchain also achieves exclusive rights to its inventor or assignee in exchange of details about the blockchain invented to be released in the public domain. An opt-in scheme could address the confidentiality concerns of IP owners.

Technology 52

Technology Patent IP Invention 52

IP Whiteboard

APRIL 15, 2021

The contents of the Letter were not private or confidential, and there was no reasonable expectation of privacy. Any privacy interest that did exist was slight, and was outweighed by the need to protect the rights of Meghan’s father and the public at large. The defendant raised a number of arguments, including that: [19]. 1] [link]. [2]

Privacy 40

Privacy Copyright Publishing Law 40