2014 Contracts Designs Due Diligence 
IP Tech Blog
MARCH 18, 2022
On January 14, 2022, Hermès filed a Complaint in the Southern District of New York alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, injury to business reputation, and misappropriation, under the federal Lanham Act and New York state law.
LexBlog IP
MARCH 18, 2022
On January 14, 2022, Hermès filed a Complaint in the Southern District of New York alleging trademark and trade dress infringement, trademark dilution, false designation of origin, cybersquatting, injury to business reputation, and misappropriation, under the federal Lanham Act and New York state law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. Further, it would also simplify due diligence required for IP transactions such as mergers and acquisitions.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. Further, it would also simplify due diligence required for IP transactions such as mergers and acquisitions.
Biswajit Sarkar Copyright Blog
MAY 7, 2021
In the case of Alice Corp v CLS Bank International, the US Supreme Court in 2014 held that claims to a computer-associated technique of mitigating “settlement risk” in various financial transactions were barred from patenting. Further, it would also simplify due diligence required for IP transactions such as mergers and acquisitions.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
NOVEMBER 24, 2021
Copyright contract law (Sections 31 et seqq. In another decision , from 2016, the BGH found that remuneration claims under Section 32 UrhG arise when the agreed remuneration at the time of the respective contract being concluded is not appropriate when viewed from the perspective of the time of conclusion of the contract (ex-ante view).
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
62 
Let's personalize your content