The IPKat

JANUARY 17, 2024

Translated into copyright language: a critical edition is an example of derivative work. In 2015, the Romanian Academy/National Foundation for Science and Art, published a book that allegedly incorporated Slușanschi’s critical edition. Despite (or rather because of ?) Indeed, in Institutul G. When the CJEU decides Institutul G.

Derivative Work 137

Derivative Work Editing Copyright Music 137

JIPL Online

MARCH 15, 2021

Then, the post will predict how Netflix may shift its content practices, defense strategies, and settlement tactics as a result of their past litigation successes in copyright actions. Mora, Netflix Will See More Copyright Litigation After Eleventh Circuit Ruling , Daily Business Review (Oct. 22, 2015), [link]. [8]

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Public Domain Derivative Work 98

JIPL Online

NOVEMBER 1, 2021

Mods are beneficial for the video game industry, [3] but mods can threaten a company’s copyright exclusivity because of their status as derivative works. [4] 4] Mods that collect revenue by paywalls are likely to scare copyright holders into litigation. [5] 11] Physical mods of game hardware are considered derivative. [12]

Derivative Work 59

Derivative Work Cease and Desist Blogging Litigation 59

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 25, 2023

In Larson, Dorland claimed copyright in a 381-word letter posted to Facebook and further asserted that, therefore, each of the three versions of Larson’s The Kindest was a derivative work in which Dorland, therefore, owned the copyright because her letter and the later Larson works were substantially similar.

Copyright 52

Copyright Social Media Plagiarism Fair Use 52

Patently-O

DECEMBER 11, 2023

But however it is interpreted, the sentence presents several concerns: 1) First, the sentence seems to assume that training a machine learning model on copyrighted works made freely available on the open Internet is likely to be deemed (or should be deemed) a copyright violation. That is far too hasty. Vanderhye v. iParadigms, LLC, 562 F.3d

Copyright 96

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Copyright Infringement 96

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 23, 2023

Warhol , at 1283-84 ] This paragraph asks the judge, or the art critic, to carry out their tasks, and consider the meaning of a work. But to do so without considering the work’s significance and without considering the subjective intent of the person creating the derivative work or the subjective impact of that work upon the viewer.

Copyright 52

Copyright Art Copying Derivative Work 52

LexBlog IP

JULY 21, 2021

The Compendium specifically excludes works alleged to be created by a divine being.” ” Jarrod Welsh, Copyrighting God: New Copyright Guidelines Do Not Protect Divine Beings, 17 Rutgers Journal Of Law & Religion 121 (2015). ” Welsh (2015) at 134. Compendium, at Section 313.2 ]. ” Id. ” Id.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Invention Trademark Copyright 52