The IPKat

JANUARY 27, 2023

In 2015, Mr. Jing co-founded Oxford Nanoimaging Ltd (ONI). In 2016, ONI licensed the Nanoimager from the University, whereby the University received royalties on ONI’s sales of the Nanoimager based on the terms of the IP Provisions. As well, he contributed to the further development of the Nanoimager. But unfair?

Inventor 98

Inventor IP Contracts Invention 98

LexBlog IP

APRIL 3, 2023

This is an important decision to review in understanding licensing and litigation of international SEP portfolios. This decision indicates that a FRAND commitment is not a one-way street, but imposes obligations on both the SEP owner and someone seeking to license the SEP. This decision indicates they should.

Licensing 52

Licensing Technology Intellectual Property Patent 52

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 5, 2022

This is a case that has been vigorously litigated since 2015 and has already been up on appeal to the U.S. CODA and its owner, Frantisek Hrabel, brought suit against Goodyear and one of its engineers, Robert Benedict, in 2015, claiming that Benedict and Goodyear had stolen their trade secrets for a self-inflating tire technology and process.

Litigation 52

Litigation Technology Licensing Inventor 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 28, 2022

This is a case that has been vigorously litigated since 2015 and has already been up on appeal to the U.S. CODA and its owner, Frantisek Hrabel, brought suit against Goodyear and one of its engineers, Robert Benedict, in 2015, claiming that Benedict and Goodyear had stolen their trade secrets for a self-inflating tire technology and process.

Litigation 52

Litigation Technology Licensing Inventor 52

Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

JANUARY 3, 2023

From 2015 through 2017, Rae served as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Gloria M. from The George Washington University Law School in 2015. Patent and Trademark Office, Lawrence has also assisted clients with patent due diligence, patent prosecution, and other non-litigation patent analysis, including IP licensing.

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Journalism Intellectual Property Law Litigation 52

IP and Legal Filings

MARCH 2, 2023

McQuewan [ii] , wherein the United States Supreme Court drew a distinction between procuring a patented machine and securing a license to use the patent’s rights. 08, 2015), [link] [ii] Bloomer v. [i] [Image Sources : Shutterstock] For the very first time the doctrine found a mention in the decision of Bloomer v. McQuewan 55 U.S.

Intellectual Property 72

Intellectual Property IP Marketing Marketing 72

LexBlog IP

JANUARY 5, 2022

But the Texas courts found no taking, reasoning that nothing was taken from the photographer as he still had the right to use, and license others to use, his photographs. 973,] 980 [(2015) ]; [Pascal] Chapdelaine, [The Property Attributes of Copyright,] 10 Buff. See Jim Olive Photography, d/b/a Photolive, Inc., Nation Enters.,

Intellectual Property 52

Intellectual Property Government Invention Copyright 52