Remove 2024 Remove Copying Remove Designs Remove Invention
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Written Description Requirement and Prior Art Statements Supporting a Motivation to Combine

Intellectual Property Law Blog

February 9, 2024) addressed two issues: (1) when the written description requirement is met in the context of a claimed range that is narrower than the ranges disclosed in the patent specification, and (2) the kind of prior art disclosure language which supports a finding of a motivation to combine for an obviousness rejection. 4th 1323 (Fed.

Art 130
article thumbnail

Has Diehr been Overruled?; and How do you Prove Technological Advance

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch Ficep begins its petition for certiorari with a brilliant statement of how its patented steel manufacturing method has won numerous awards and complements for its innovative approach, been copied by competitors, and led to numerous successful sales. There was copying by competitors.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

USPTO call for comments: Impact of AI on patentability

The IPKat

Comments are due by 29 June 2024. The international standards for patentability require that an invention is novel and inventive in view of the prior art. Brave new world Alternatively, AI could be thought of as akin to a natural phenomena, from which isolating a chemical or structure may be considered an invention.

Patent 62
article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 4-March 10)

SpicyIP

Case Summaries Therelek Machines Private Limited vs Therelek Engineers Private Limited on 28 February, 2024 (Karnataka High Court) The petitioner challenged the rejection of its interim application under Section 124 of the Trade Marks Act, seeking a stay in a suit for trademark infringement.

article thumbnail

Gilead and ViiV Healthcare Settle Global Patent Dispute for Over $1B USD

IPilogue

ViiV Healthcare (“ViiV”), majority-owned by GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”), claims that Gilead’s bictegravir (sold under the brand name “Biktarvy”) directly copied its dolutegravir’s formulation under U.S. Under this doctrine, the inventor could not then sue another for using the three-wheeled or four-wheeled design.

Patent 120
article thumbnail

N.D. Cal. Judge Pushes Back on Copyright SAD Scheme Cases–Viral DRM v. YouTube Schedule A Defendants

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

“Plaintiff alleges Defendants downloaded and copied Plaintiff’s copyrighted materials from YouTube, and then re-uploaded infringing versions of Plaintiff’s copyrighted media content to their YouTube channels.” YouTube Uploaders Listed on Schedule A , 2024 WL 189013 (N.D. Onyshchuk , 2024 WL 189011 (N.D.

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Rules on Written Description Requirement and Prior Art Statements Supporting a Motivation to Combine

LexBlog IP

February 9, 2024) addressed two issues: (1) when the written description requirement is met in the context of a claimed range that is narrower than the ranges disclosed in the patent specification, and (2) the kind of prior art disclosure language which supports a finding of a motivation to combine for an obviousness rejection.

Art 52