Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 13, 2023

For more background on competitive keyword advertising by lawyers, see this article. May 10, 2023) More Posts About Keyword Advertising * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?) 2023 WL 3340214 (W.D.

Law 93

Law Advertising Advertising False Advertising 93

43(B)log

MARCH 28, 2024

26, 2024) Defendant, d/b/a Wonderland, operated an adult entertainment club and was one of the many such sued by various models for using their images in advertising without their consent from 2015 to 2019. Princeton then sued Wonderland and the models, seeking a declaratory judgment that it has no obligations under the Consent Judgment.

Advertising 64

Advertising Advertising Settlement Contracts 64

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 18, 2023

This case involves Jim Adler, a/k/a the “Texas Hammer,” a Texas lawyer who has spent $100M+ on advertising to build his brand. For background on the legal battles over keyword advertising by lawyers, see this article. Bye, Goff * Yet More Evidence That Keyword Advertising Lawsuits Are Stupid–Porta-Fab v. Adler PC v.

Advertising 84

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Trademark 84

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 30, 2023

This is a competitive keyword advertising lawsuit. This is fine, but it deviates from courts’ efforts over the years to come up with multi-factor variations specific to keyword advertising. ” But the advertiser was engaging in comparative advertising, which I think also strongly serves the public interest.

Advertising 88

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Trademark 88

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JANUARY 8, 2024

This is a case involving a trademark owner and a competitive keyword advertiser. That’s certainly true for high-profile and well-advertised consumer items like fast food chains, mass-market phones, and major car labels, but is it true in this particular niche? Google * Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v.

Trademark 80

Trademark Advertising Advertising False Advertising 80

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

FEBRUARY 16, 2022

More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. lululemon. * Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. * Want to Engage in Anti-Competitive Trademark Bullying? Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless….

IP 129

IP Advertising Advertising Trademark Law 129

43(B)log

DECEMBER 22, 2023

20, 2023) The court denies settlement approval in this case alleging that Macy’s misrepresented the thread count in some of the sheets it sold, because it doesn’t like the cy pres part of the remedy. The global class action settlement created a $10.5 million common fund, and the parties jointly moved the court to approve.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Settlement 59

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 26, 2022

I’ve often wondered about the conversations that take place between trademark owner and counsel before filing a keyword advertising lawsuit. Now he’s helping out by helping build out defense-side keyword advertising precedents. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. * How extensively do they discuss the risks?

Trademark 101

Trademark Advertising Advertising Litigation 101

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 25, 2021

If they really wanted to build their business, they could have invested that money into marketing instead of legal fees. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Ohio Bans Competitive Keyword Advertising by Lawyers. 1-800 Contacts. * Another Failed Trademark Suit Over Competitive Keyword Advertising–JIVE v. Google cases.

Advertising 107

Advertising Advertising Settlement Trademark 107

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

AUGUST 17, 2021

However, “[b]ecause meta tags direct internet traffic and are invisible to the internet user (absent the user taking additional steps), meta tags are similar to keyword advertising” (citing a non-precedential metatags opinion from 20 years ago). More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Distraction is insufficient. OK, I guess.

Advertising 105

Advertising Advertising Trademark Settlement 105

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MARCH 13, 2022

.” The false designation of origin claim is similarly governed by the Ninth Circuit’s Lasoff v. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Claim Fails–Reflex Media v. Google. * Competitive Keyword Advertising Still Isn’t Trademark Infringement, Unless…. Amazon ruling.

Trademark 81

Trademark Advertising Advertising Settlement 81

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 9, 2022

He claims that Glock entered into settlements with confidentiality provisions with those who sued over the defect, to prevent the public from learning about it. FAL falsity: The court agreed that, unlike the CLRA or fraudulent omission, the FAL requires an affirmative statement because it requires an “advertisement.”

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Confidentiality 59

43(B)log

JUNE 16, 2022

Shifting to this business model “dramatically increased its profits while reducing the share of the money raised that is passed on to charities.” Although members of the public are able to enter for chances to win prizes without paying money, Omaze advertises increased opportunities to win in exchange for larger donations.”

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Designs 59

43(B)log

SEPTEMBER 7, 2021

accused product another another The subsequent stipulation to a permanent injunction did not cover the registrations, but there is apparently a confidential settlement agreement that may have covered them.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Registration Trademark Registering Trademarks 59

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 2, 2022

Readers who are wondering about the legality of buying reviews may recall that earlier this year the FTC published related business guidance , and buying fake reviews was highlighted as a big “no.” The proposed order makes it clear that the money will go to the states and not the FTC. But we leave with two closing thoughts.

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Settlement Publishing Law 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 22, 2023

This case involves two rival personal injury law firms in Arizona, one of which engaged in competitive keyword advertising against the other. May 18, 2023) More Posts About Keyword Advertising * More on Law Firms and Competitive Keyword Ads–Nicolet Law v. Allied Modular * Griper’s Keyword Ads May Constitute False Advertising (Huh?)–LoanStreet

Advertising 108

Advertising Advertising False Advertising Trademark 108

43(B)log

NOVEMBER 27, 2023

MillerKing, a small Chicago law firm that claims to be a direct competitor of DNP, sued DNP for false association and false advertising under the Lanham Act and Illinois state law. DNP advertises that it uses artificial intelligence” rather than “human knowledge.” But DNP isn’t actually licensed to practice law.

False Advertising 49

False Advertising Advertising Advertising Contracts 49

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JUNE 29, 2022

This week, another court added to 1-800 Contacts’ smouldering pile of trademark jurisprudence and granted a judgment on the pleadings (Rule 12(c)) dismissing 1-800 Contacts’ competitive keyword advertising lawsuit against its rival Warby Parker. More Posts About Keyword Advertising. Keyword Ads. Proximity of goods.

Trademark 108

Trademark Advertising Advertising Blogging 108

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 20, 2023

.” The agency stated in a press release that “boosting your products by hijacking another product’s ratings or reviews is a relatively new tactic, but is still plain old false advertising.” If the FTC felt this practice was deceptive or misleading, how about articulating this as new business guidance?

False Advertising 52

False Advertising Branding Brands Branding 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

SEPTEMBER 14, 2021

Plus, does this mean that rival apps can’t advertise themselves as rivals or engage in comparative advertising because the app stores aren’t properly labeling the ads, even if the advertisers are engaging in nominative use? More Posts About Keyword Advertising. HEY APP STORES–FIX THIS. Purchaser care.

Advertising 101

Advertising Advertising Trademark Settlement 101

43(B)log

APRIL 17, 2023

Even if owners contacting Aaronson as a result of exposure to the allegedly false websites was evidence of materiality, there wasn’t such evidence here: almost all of the putatively affected owners were referred to defendants by outside lawyers. Plaintiffs neither deposed that owner nor included them in their expert’s damages report.

False Advertising 59

False Advertising Litigation Advertising Advertising 59

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t protect consumers and facilitated anticompetitive claims about false advertising. Nor did he allege any lost business opportunities as the result of their presence on the market.

IP 94

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 94

LexBlog IP

MARCH 1, 2022

Last month, as part of BakerHostetler’s “Look Back, Look Ahead: Advertising and Marketing Law in 2021 & 2022” webinar series, partners Craig A. Ultimately, the California enforcers reached a financial settlement with the clothing brand that includes injunctive terms governing future conduct. Takeaway No.

Social Media 52

Social Media Privacy Advertising Advertising 52