article thumbnail

False Patent Marking as False Advertising: Overcoming Dastar

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch The Federal Circuit is set to consider the use of terms like “patented,” “proprietary,” and “exclusive” in commercial advertising can be actionable under ยง 43(a)(1)(B) of the Lanham Act when their use is not entirely accurate. Crocs largely prevailed in those actions. ” Dawgs brief.

article thumbnail

Examining the Circuit Split on Preliminary Injunctions in False Advertising Post-eBay

IP Watchdog

In responding to the unprecedented COVID-19 challenges, companies around the world are rushing to capitalize on the current crisis by advertising the effectiveness of their products in containing the virus spread. As fear and anxiety proliferate during this pandemic, fraudulent or false advertisements also surge and explode.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

plaintiff has standing to seek injunctive relief against allegedly falsely advertised penile implant

43(B)log

The Ninth Circuit has held: โ€œ[i]n some cases, the threat of future harm may be the consumerโ€™s plausible allegations that she will be unable to rely on the productโ€™s advertising or labeling in the future, and so will not purchase the product although she would like to.โ€

article thumbnail

False advertising and TM infringement receive very different damages treatment: case in point

43(B)log

17, 2023) Another entry in the โ€œcourts treat Lanham Act false advertising very differently than Lanham Act trademark infringement, despite identical damages provisionsโ€ line. CareDx sued Natera for false advertising. Natera, Inc., 19-662-CFC, 2023 WL 4561059 (D. Natera made superiority claims for its Prospera.

article thumbnail

alleged misrepresentation of partnership/approval suffices for false advertising claim

43(B)log

8, 2023) When does TM logic creep into false advertising cases? Tundra allegedly uses the information it scrapes from Faireโ€™s platform, including contact information, to market its product. The screenshot was โ€œcommercial advertising or promotion.โ€ Faire Wholesale, Inc. Tundra, Inc., 2023 WL 8586681, No.

article thumbnail

10th Circuit endorses presumption of Lanham Act false advertising injury in mostly two-player market

43(B)log

Vitamins Online sued Heartwise under the Lanham Act and Utahโ€™s Unfair Competition Law for false advertising about the ingredients of its competitive nutritional supplements and manipulating those productsโ€™ Amazon reviews. NatureWiseโ€™s products advertised that they met the same Dr. Oz-endorsed requirements. Heartwise, Inc.,

article thumbnail

Retailer has standing to assert Lanham Act false advertising claims against its own supplier

43(B)log

In summer 2020, AHBP began negotiating with the Lynd defendants for the exclusive license to market and sell a surface disinfectant/cleaner known as โ€œBioprotect 500โ€ in Argentina. Lynd advertised the Product as effective against the coronavirus. the Lanham Act false advertising claim survived.