SpicyIP

DECEMBER 6, 2023

In St Art India Foundation v. Acko General Insurance , the Delhi High Court is faced with the opportunity to elaborate whether and how street art in general is subject to the Copyright Act, the scope of ‘artistic work’ under Sec. 2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. Image from the order. 57 of the Act.

Moral Rights 49

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Artistic Work 49

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 10, 2023

Or, Can I post a photo of graffiti art to Instagram? Feeling inspired and intrepid you snap a photo, instantly uploading it to your story with a witty one-liner about undiscovered urban art. What if the social media account is used to promote the account owner’s own goods or services, or a third party’s brand?

Social Media 52

Social Media Art Fair Use Moral Rights 52

The IPKat

JULY 9, 2023

An Oral History of Creative Processes in Street Art and Graffiti Subcultures ”, authored by Enrico Bonadio (City University of London). As its title suggests, this book focuses on the relationship between US copyright law and street art and graffiti. Chapter 3 is entitled "Copyright within the street art and graffiti circles".

Art 57

Art Copyright Moral Rights Cease and Desist 57

JIPEL Copyright Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

From July 2017 to April 2018, the Art Gallery of Ontario (the “AGO”) staged an exhibition titled “ ReBlink ,” which urged visitors to “[t]ake a second look… with a modern lens:”. infringement of the creator’s exclusive right to reproduce and/or prepare a derivative work) or VARA/moral rights (i.e.,

Moral Rights 52

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Social Media 52

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 30, 2023

The Court also held that the rejection order’s finding on lack of novelty and inventive step was not accurate and rather the controller had adopted a hindsight view of the prior art and failed to establish how the prior art documents made the invention non-novel. Acko General Insurance.

IP 124

IP Copyright Trademark Intellectual Property 124

43(B)log

APRIL 7, 2023

EU has been first mover on some things and not others (Art. A service provider decides what it must do under 512 and the DSA/Art. Then figures out what it must do: in US, don’t engage in primary or secondary infringement. Guess: many service providers will therefore stick with 512; US wins, but maybe for the wrong reasons.

Art 45

Art Copyright Settlement Moral Rights 45