SpicyIP

DECEMBER 6, 2023

2(c), the fair use exemption thereof under Sec. 52(1)(t) and ‘moral rights’ of the author in such work. 52(1)(t); and (ii) if yes, whether the proviso of the same or ‘fixation requirement’ excludes it from the scope of fair use. As a corollary, it also asserted ‘moral rights’ over the mural under Sec.

Moral Rights 49

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Artistic Work 49

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 10, 2023

So if graffiti can be protected, does one need permission from the artist to photograph the work and then “publish” it to a social media platform? What if the social media account is used to promote the account owner’s own goods or services, or a third party’s brand? VARA is part of U.S.

Social Media 52

Social Media Art Fair Use Moral Rights 52

The IPKat

JULY 9, 2023

This chapter reminds one that there is case law in which street artists and writers have asserted their moral rights. Those artists are attached to their creations and to the right of attribution. Once again, opinions are divided on the importance of the right of attribution. The same is for moral rights.

Art 57

Art Copyright Moral Rights Cease and Desist 57

JIPEL Copyright Blog

MARCH 9, 2022

The museum industry, it would seem, is taking note of technology’s growing role in its operations, particularly in regards to visitor engagement and staying relevant in a social media-driven society where declining visitation rates have only been exacerbated by the ongoing pandemic.

Moral Rights 52

Moral Rights Fair Use Art Social Media 52

SpicyIP

DECEMBER 20, 2023

If you are the one wondering this, then see Karishma Karthik’s two-part post examining the moral right of integrity and its potential as a tool in protecting the authors posthumously. Some more elaborative takes on this issue be found in Inika Charles’ post on Brosnan’s ‘Pan’demonium , Kiran George’s post on the F.R.I.E.N.D.Z.

Personality Rights 59

Personality Rights IP Licensing Copyright 59

JIPL Online

APRIL 9, 2021

On one hand, those who view intellectual property rights as a limited monopoly would suggest that even derivative use of the content in a meme is infringement on the rights holder’s interest. Keller, Recognizing the Derivative Works Right as a Moral Right: A Case Comparison and Proposal , 63 Case W.

Copyright Infringement 98

Copyright Infringement Copyright Intellectual Property Blogging 98

SpicyIP

JULY 11, 2021

He evaluates the various applicable laws to argue that a thesis is a ‘public document’, the right to access which is available to the public as a matter of public interest, as well as through fair use under Section 52 of Copyright Act and also the RTI Act. Other Posts. Delhi High Court in FMC Corporation & Anr.

Moral Rights 105

Moral Rights Journalism Licensing IP 105