LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 28, 2022

2] Since we last discussed that decision on this blog in June 2021, [3] the Second Circuit reconsidered it following a subsequent landmark Supreme Court decision addressing fair use ( Google LLC v. 4] ), and issued a new decision in which it reached the same result. [5].

Fair Use 97

Fair Use Derivative Work Art Licensing 97

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 24, 2023

Session 1: Identifying and Explaining Anachronisms Introduction: Mark McKenna: Every year, a TM exam could be written differently: one a very conventional exam question with Company A using one mark and Company B using a similar mark/similar goods, conventional walk through confusion factors in the way the test was designed to deal with.

Trademark 49

Trademark Branding Brands Branding 49

LexBlog IP

JULY 11, 2022

This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association or the copyright holder. This article was written by Josh Escovedo and Michelle Yegiyants.

Marketing 52

Marketing Marketing Law All Rights Reserved 52

The IP Law Blog

JULY 11, 2022

This information or any portion thereof may not be copied or disseminated in any form or by any means or stored in an electronic database or retrieval system without the express written consent of the American Bar Association or the copyright holder. This article was written by Josh Escovedo and Michelle Yegiyants.

Law 52

Law Marketing Marketing All Rights Reserved 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 25, 2023

You can get a sense for what the use of the putative mark was like at first use, if your data are rich enough. Skeptical that it could help w/confusion though. New article proposes judging similarity—he’s very skeptical both of cost and whether it tells us anything [we don’t already know]. What about ChatGPT?

Trademark 72

Trademark Marketing Marketing Advertising 72

LexBlog IP

FEBRUARY 1, 2023

And the debate continues, with Seattle, Los Angeles, NYC, Fairfax County (Virginia), and Montgomery County (Alabama) for example, having banned its use on or blocked its access on their public school systems and devices, while other educators are advocating its incorporation into the curriculum, according to both Forbes and the New York Times. .

Trademark 52

Trademark Intellectual Property Branding Brands 52

43(B)log

FEBRUARY 23, 2024

Introduction: Rebecca Tushnet What might we derive from things the Court has said about trademark of late? see also Booking: once source identification is shown, all other issues are dealt with as limitations on rights/incorporated into the confusion test.] Dinwoodie and Janis taken out of context?

Trademark 45

Trademark Law Branding Brands 45