Remove Artistic Work Remove Artwork Remove Invention Remove Presentation
article thumbnail

How A Century-Old Insight of Photography Can Inform Legal Questions of AI-Generated Artwork (Guest Blog Post)

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

A new breed of artists is using generative artificial intelligence tools like DALLĀ·E, Midjourney, Firefly, and ChatGPT to create artistic works. Do these creations belong to the artists or the public domain? The public at the time widely viewed photography as merely the work of machine , not a tool for artistic vision.

Artwork 96
article thumbnail

AI Generated Art and its conflict with IPR

IIPRD

This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. This question even after a broad reading of the Indian Copyright law remains unanswered, demanding an amendment in the present law or more clarity on the same by the way of judicial decisions.

Art 52
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

National IPR Policy : An Analysis

IP and Legal Filings

Intellectual Property Right The rights and privileges accorded to persons over their creative works, such as innovations, works of literature, and artwork, as well as use of names, logos and pictures in trade are known as intellectual property rights (IPR). In reaction, they invite for a Data Exclusivity law.

article thumbnail

Copyright Laws & Trademark Infringement for NFTs

Traverse Legal Blog

Intellectual property or IP is a creative work or invention that one holds rights to. An NFT, or ā€œnon-fungible tokenā€ is a token added to a blockchain that links ownership to unique digital items (images, video files, audio files, artworks, etc.). What is Intellectual Property? What is a Non Fungible Token?

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (March 4-March 10)

SpicyIP

The decision highlighted the Controller’s duty to consider existing knowledge and the inventive step properly. ” The Deputy Controller of Patents cited lack of novelty and inventive step (Section 2(1)(ja)) and non-compliance with Section 59(1). Dr Reddy S Laboratories Limited vs Neutec Healthcare Pvt. United Biotech Pvt.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (December 18- December 24)

SpicyIP

From an in-depth discussion on the terms of copyright and translations in India to the recent UK Supreme Courtā€™s order regarding the patentability of inventions by an AI, we had some engaging posts on this blog this week. The Court directed the NBA to determine whether the invention relates to biological resource with a reasoned order.

article thumbnail

[Guest post] Litigation commenced against the developers of AI image generation software

The IPKat

This litigation has arisen amongst a flurry of recent interest in AI generated works. There has been limited case law citing the section 9(3) and there remains some ambiguity and academic debate on the ownership of computer-generated works under English law.