Artwork Derivative Work Fair Use Ownership 
IIPRD
APRIL 8, 2024
This article delves into the ongoing debate around the issue of right of ownership of copyright by AI generators for their novel artwork. 2] This shift i.e. from assisting work to generating it has taken the legal regime of IPR by a storm of confusion and questions.
LexBlog IP
MAY 19, 2023
Upon failure to resolve the matter privately, AWF filed suit against Goldsmith, seeking a declaratory judgment that Warhol’s works did not infringe Goldsmith’s copyright in the original photograph, or, in the alternative, Warhol’s works constituted fair use of the subject photograph. [1]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
AUGUST 7, 2023
Thus, guided by the principle of equality, copyright operates as a spectrum of creativity, where the level of protection granted to a work corresponds to its level of originality. [2] 2] At one end of the spectrum, we find plagiarism: a completely derivative work that fails to contribute any creative elements to the original piece.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
MAY 9, 2023
The biggest copyright law question in the EU and US is probably whether using in-copyright works to train generative AI models is copyright infringement or falls under the transient and temporary copying and TDM exceptions (in the EU) or fair use (in the US). In the aftermath of cases like Authors Guild v.
LexBlog IP
APRIL 13, 2022
2] Dash originally planned to use SuperFarm, an NFT website, to mint and sell the NFT of the album. [3] Tarantino [14] also involves a dispute over copyright ownership, along with claims for trademark infringement and breach of contract. However, Damon lacked any individual interest in the copyright. [2] Miramax LLC v.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content