LexBlog IP

MAY 19, 2023

Upon failure to resolve the matter privately, AWF filed suit against Goldsmith, seeking a declaratory judgment that Warhol’s works did not infringe Goldsmith’s copyright in the original photograph, or, in the alternative, Warhol’s works constituted fair use of the subject photograph. [1]

Licensing 52

Licensing Fair Use Copyright Derivative Work 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

MAY 9, 2023

The biggest copyright law question in the EU and US is probably whether using in-copyright works to train generative AI models is copyright infringement or falls under the transient and temporary copying and TDM exceptions (in the EU) or fair use (in the US). In the aftermath of cases like Authors Guild v.

Copyright 138

Copyright Fair Use Copyright Law Law 138

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 10, 2023

However, in 5Pointz the building owner consented to the artwork installation. What if the social media account is used to promote the account owner’s own goods or services, or a third party’s brand? Copyright Law grants the author the exclusive rights to exploit the work, subject to certain fair use defenses.

Social Media 52

Social Media Art Fair Use Moral Rights 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

MAY 30, 2022

Finally, it points out Viacom is the owner of three valid trademark registrations for the KRUSTY KRAB mark and 400 copyright registrations covering “creative aspects of the SpongeBob SquarePants franchise,” including episodes from the animated television series, movies, drawings, and stylebooks featuring artwork from the franchise.

Blogging 91

Blogging Social Media Television Fair Use 91

LexBlog IP

OCTOBER 3, 2023

Copyright Office’s denial of a copyright application for a work created using generative AI due to lack of human authorship ( Thaler v. The Copyright Office denied protection for Jason Allen’s science-fiction themed artwork “Theatre D’opera Spatial,” which he created with an AI tool called “Midjourney.”

Copyright 52

Copyright Copyright Law Artistic Work Ownership 52

Kluwer Copyright Blog

AUGUST 7, 2023

In this case, the author of the original work retains ownership of the original, while the author of the derivative work holds rights to the creative additions they have made. In the United States, the Copyright Act outlines the concept of fair use – situations where usage does not require authorization. 37, 2018). [3]

Copyright 52

Copyright Derivative Work Fair Use Copyright Law 52

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 14, 2023

Allen won first place at the Colorado State Fair (the “Competition”) for the two-dimensional artwork entitled Théâtre D’opéra Spatial (the “Work”), which he produced with the aid of Artificial Intelligence (“AI”). Last year, Jason M. Therefore, they dismissed this argument.

Art 52

Art Copyright Registration Fair Use 52

IP and Legal Filings

SEPTEMBER 30, 2022

Even presently, user creation and ownership of valuable assets and currencies contribute to developing a unified metaverse, which includes VR Technology, Augmented Reality, virtual currencies, NFTs, and other similar technologies. Artists are using virtual reality and augmented reality to create previously unimagined artworks.

Trademark 52

Trademark Ownership Branding Brands 52

SpicyIP

MARCH 10, 2023

Through an examination of ChatGPT’s ‘Terms of Use’, our former blogger Varsha Jhavar attempts to investigate the copyright implications of the chatbot inter alia touching upon the issue of ownership and assignment of the output generated. Her previous posts on the blog can be viewed here , here , here and here.

Copyright 105

Copyright Copyright Law Ownership Copyright Infringement 105

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 15, 2022

NFTs are units of data stored on a blockchain that signify ownership of (supposedly) unique digital media items. Judge Rakoff did observe that use of NFTs in connection with the underlying work should not automatically strip the work of artistic significance.

IP 52

IP Non-Fungible Tokens Artwork Intellectual Property 52

IIPRD

FEBRUARY 25, 2022

NFTs have indeed transformed the world of digital assets and ownership, with sales as high as $2.47bn only 6 months into 2021. Moreover, a mere collage of an artwork “Everydays – The First 5000 Days” made by him was sold for $69.3mnin an auction. Tokenisation and Ownership of Digital Assets under NFTs.

Non-Fungible Tokens 40

Non-Fungible Tokens IP Ownership Intellectual Property 40

Kluwer Copyright Blog

OCTOBER 17, 2023

Apart from revolutionizing the creative markets, the ability to obtain new artworks with an increasing marginalization of human contribution has inevitably tested the fitness of copyright legislations all over the world to deal with the so-called “artificial intelligence” (‘AI’). ChatGPT , Smodin ), to perform music (i.e.,

Copyright 124

Copyright Art Copyright Law Licensing 124

IIPRD

JANUARY 18, 2022

It has the ability to be one-of-a-kind and unrepeatable token that cannot be split but may be used to represent real or virtual world things, as well as the token’s own qualities and ownership, all while remaining within a blockchain representation. This endows NFTs with the unique qualities that make them so desirable.

Non-Fungible Tokens 40

Non-Fungible Tokens Intellectual Property Ownership Branding 40

LexBlog IP

APRIL 13, 2022

2] Dash originally planned to use SuperFarm, an NFT website, to mint and sell the NFT of the album. [3] Tarantino [14] also involves a dispute over copyright ownership, along with claims for trademark infringement and breach of contract. However, Damon lacked any individual interest in the copyright. [2] Miramax LLC v.

Non-Fungible Tokens 52

Non-Fungible Tokens Social Media Contracts Branding 52