Remove authors mark-simpson
article thumbnail

Using dominant competitor's part names/numbers for comparison isn't false advertising, TM infringement, or (c) infringement

43(B)log

Simpson Strong-Tie Co. Simpson or MiTek), which the contractor/subcontractor is responsible for purchasing. MiTek’s product and part names are also descriptive, but MiTek often begins by assigning a MiTek connector in development the same name as the Simpson connector with which MiTek intends to compete. 2023 WL 8697700, No.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 7: TTAB Sanctions Party for Flagrant Violation of the Standard Protective Order

The TTABlog

It provides that information marked "Attorneys' Eyes Only" may be viewed only by outside counsel for the parties (and by independent experts or consultants). The Board also has the power to enter sanctions "that extends from the Board's 'inherent authority to control the disposition of cases on its docket.'"

Designs 86
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Precedential No. 17: TTAB Dismisses ADVENTIST Cancellation Petition Due to Failure to Maintain "Standing"

The TTABlog

Finding that Petitioner failed to demonstrate its entitlement to maintain its genericness claim (f/k/a standing), the Board tossed out this petition for cancellation of two registrations for the mark ADVENTIST for religious publications, film production and distribution, educational services, and religious and missionary services.

article thumbnail

Full Of Sound And Query, Signifying Something: Recent Noise Over Acoustic Trademarks

LexBlog IP

I start with MGM and Penn State, not because MGM’s registered trademark and Penn State’s common law one are at odds, but because they are two well-known acoustic, or sound (or auditory), marks that can help us understand those sounding off recently about such non-traditional trademarks.