Kluwer Copyright Blog
OCTOBER 5, 2022
With the exception of CC0, CC licences allow authors to keep their copyright whilst at the same time communicate which rights they reserve and which rights they waive for public benefit. In their blog post , CC have effectively warned readers that many people misunderstand what a CC licence actually means.
JIPL Online
MARCH 15, 2021
1] This blog will briefly summarize a few of the notable copyright infringement cases Netflix has defended against in the United States. 2] While most Sherlock Holmes stories are now in the public domain, the estate alleged that some works and character elements regarding Sherlock Holmes are still protected by copyright. [3]
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
LexBlog IP
DECEMBER 21, 2021
The simple answer: public domain came to the rescue. When 1974 (28 years after 1946) came around, NTA failed to file for renewal, which meant It’s a Wonderful Life entered the public domain. This resulted in the production company producing the film at a pretty significant loss.
Kluwer Copyright Blog
APRIL 22, 2022
This two-part blog post contains a summary of our report’s conclusions and recommendations. A piece of AI music output created with one click on a button specifically for this blog post using folk-rnn could be enjoyed here: [link]. 1] (On the topic of AI outputs and derivative works, see here.). folk-rnn , Melomics ).
LexBlog IP
APRIL 15, 2022
Disney should also be strategically liberal in its lawsuits—both under trademark law and under derivative works. While copyright protection expires, trademark protection does not. ” Disney has trademark protection for Mickey Mouse.
JIPEL Copyright Blog
MARCH 9, 2022
addition of written or pictorial elements) of a work not in the public domain and/or where the creator is still alive. infringement of the creator’s exclusive right to reproduce and/or prepare a derivative work) or VARA/moral rights (i.e.,
LexBlog IP
FEBRUARY 28, 2022
1] That decision shook the art world, as it seems to dramatically narrow the scope of the fair use doctrine, and raises doubts about the lawfulness of many existing works. [2] These divergent approaches and the persistent lack of clarity delineating a transformative use from a derivative work may compel the Supreme Court to intervene.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
110 
Let's personalize your content