Remove Branding Remove False Advertising Remove Litigation Remove Social Media
article thumbnail

False patent marking claims survive even when Dastar bars false advertising claims based on "innovation"

43(B)log

30, 2024) (R&R) Recommendation: Dastar should block Qingdao’s Lanham Act false advertising counterclaims based on Lashify’s claim to be the originator of lash technology, but false patent marking counterclaims should survive. However, the Noerr-Pennington doctrine didn’t apply to this case at this stage of the litigation.

article thumbnail

WIPIP session 4: ™ & Consumers

43(B)log

Mary Katherine Amerine, Reasonably Careless Consumers in TM & False Advertising How do courts treat consumers in TM and false advertising cases? False advertising uses v different framework: consider the challenged ad as a whole, including disclaimers and qualifying language. Beer Nuts, Bulls’ Eye v.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Section 230 Protects Services That Permit Anonymous Third-Party Posts–Bride v. Snap

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

A couple of specifics: The false advertising claims don’t escape 230: “Had those third-party users refrained from posting harmful content, Plaintiffs’ claims that Defendants falsely advertised and misrepresented their applications’ safety would not be cognizable.” Despite Doe v. I share the heartbreak.

article thumbnail

Models' false endorsement claims fail for want of recognition, bad survey

43(B)log

Facts in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs: Each of the plaintiffs has a significant number of followers on various social media platforms, ranging from greater than ten thousand to several million, and most are “considered social media influencers.” The court was guided by Electra v. 59 Murray Enterprises, Inc.,

article thumbnail

political speech isn't covered by Lanham Act but is protected by Cal anti-SLAPP law

43(B)log

4, 2022) Mosafer, a travel business that “aligns its branding with the State of Qatar,” sued several defendants for making public statements allegedly disparaging the State of Qatar and harming the Mosafer parties’ brand, which is closely aligned with the country. protects the speech of non-citizens as well as speech abroad.”

Law 59
article thumbnail

Battle of the experts: court deals with surveys, damages, other Lanham Act experts

43(B)log

In re: Elysium Health-ChromaDex Litigation, No. Damages experts: The court began with a statement that a Lanham Act [false advertising] plaintiff must prove causation to get damages. 17-cv-7394 (LJL), 2022 WL 421135 (S.D.N.Y. test/control stimuli His survey population differed somewhat as did the control group/questions.

article thumbnail

TMSR Session 3: Private Actors…and their Machines

43(B)log

A variant of separating the mark from the brand; not seeing it in all categories, and we may have a world in which some marks—maybe the 1%--are not divided from brands but the others are. Brands can choose to “gate” on Amazon with authorization letters, but how does the consumer know the seller will stick to selling genuine goods?