Cease and Desist Design Intellectual Property Law Registration 
Kashishipr
NOVEMBER 2, 2022
Maintaining a Trademark Registration can indeed be challenging if you aren’t familiar with the Trademark Law. Firstly, it is imperative to understand what a trademark is and how it differs from other forms of Intellectual Property (IP). Some Other Crucial Aspects to Keep in Mind.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 28, 2022
LVB is in the business of designing, manufacturing and selling window treatments, blinds and shades. LVB has a federal trademark registration, with the USPTO , for the word mark GENESIS under Registration No. 1125 and Trademark Infringement under Indiana Common Law.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 9, 2022
PUMA SE , based in Herzogenaurach, Germany, is a multi-national company that designs and manufactures athletic and casual footwear, apparel, and accessories. PUMA applied for a Federal Trademark registration under Application Serial No. Brooks”) cease and desist the use of the Mark NITRO mark in connection with footwear.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 9, 2021
Apparently realizing the importance of its brand, Monster owns at least fourteen federal trademark registrations that include the Claw Icon in various classes of goods and services (the “Asserted Marks”). Finally, Monster is claiming Bear’s actions constitute unfair competition under Indiana common law.
Art Law Journal
JUNE 30, 2022
Few people would want something that they put their heart and soul into creating, whether that’s art, music, design, or an invention, being used or sold without their permission. Fortunately, you don’t need to grasp all the complexities of Intellectual Property law to protect your creative work. Trademark Registration.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
AUGUST 6, 2021
From that transaction, Energy owns multiple trademark registrations including the three at issue in this case, U.S. Registration Nos. Energy claims it sent a cease and desist letter informing FTA of the Energy Marks and trade dress, but FTA has refused to discontinue its use of the allegedly infringing marks.
Indiana Intellectual Property Law
JULY 21, 2021
Registration No./Serial As of the filing of the Complaint, Vroom claims Defendants did not respond to any of the cease and desist communications and continued using the Allegedly Infringing Properties. Vroom is further claiming Defendants’ actions constitute common law unfair competition and trademark infringement.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
52 
Let's personalize your content