Plagiarism Today
MAY 16, 2022
The owners of Grease sent a cease and desist letter in August 2019 that resulted in performances of Vape being cancelled. Finally today, Rich Johnston at Bleeding Cool reports that ComicMix has announced it will release a series of “lost” Dr. Seuss stories, claiming that they are out of copyright and in the public domain.
IPilogue
OCTOBER 26, 2022
In April 2022 , Uffizi sent a cease-and-desist in response to Jean Paul Gaultier’s current use of the Birth of Venus , but the fashion brand never replied and continued its unauthorized use. . The public domain refers to works not protected by copyright, which means the works can be used without acquiring permission or paying a fee.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
MAY 13, 2024
And that, in turn, further restricts what should be in the public domain and gives companies power to create property rights where none are otherwise granted in the law. a worldwide, non-exclusive, royalty-free license”), and there is no allegation that it was corrupted, changed, or deleted. see Kaplan Decl.
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 13, 2023
In that case, Judge Easterbrook wrote, in finding that a “shrinkwrap” license was enforceable against the defendant: But are rights created by contract “equivalent to any of the exclusive rights within the general scope of copyright”? Zeidenberg , the 1955 Enchantment Under the Sea Dance of Internet legal opinions.
Copyright Lately
AUGUST 2, 2022
Netflix could have sent Barlow & Bear a cease and desist letter hand-delivered by Regé-Jean Page. The company didn’t file its lawsuit as a first or even second resort, but only after the artists decided to stage their musical at the Kennedy Center of all places, and only after they declined to take a license.
IIPRD
JANUARY 23, 2023
Patent are valid for the duration of 20 years before coming into public domain) Patent infringement can occur in two ways. Often, the third-party sellers engage in selling, distributing and importing of patented product through Amazon channels without consent of the holder or license to sell that particular product. [2]
Technology & Marketing Law Blog
DECEMBER 15, 2021
To settle that dispute, the parties worked out an “exclusive” license: the second-comer could sell the design on Amazon, and the registrant could keep selling it on eBay. The second comer/licensee assigned the exclusive license to a successor licensee, the defendant in this case. assertions.
Expert insights. Personalized for you.
162 
Let's personalize your content