IP Law 360

JANUARY 31, 2023

An Indian pharmaceutical company has asked a London court to invalidate a Bayer Global AG patent that protects the blockbuster blood-thinner Xarelto, marking the latest attempt to nix the patent protecting the key ingredient of the drug.

Patent 40

Patent 40

IP Law 360

AUGUST 13, 2021

An American company that has been battling for more than a decade with German drugmaker Bayer AG over the trademark "Flanax" — Bayer's Mexican brand name for Aleve — is now once again asking the U.S. Supreme Court to tackle the case.

Trademark 40

Trademark Branding Brands Branding 40

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 13, 2022

The present case deals with the compulsory license awarded to a domestic generic pharmaceutical private company, Natco, for the manufacture and sale of the kidney cancer drug Nexavar, patented by Bayer Corporation in India. This notion is also evident from cases like Novartis AG v. Bayer first appeared on IPLF.

Licensing 52

Licensing Government Invention Patent 52

Patently-O

JUNE 29, 2022

Coca-Cola Company , 21-2209 (Fed. Although goods are often shipped globally, many companies manufacture and sell region-specific products. That divide allows the company to cater to local market preferences and regulations and also avoid potential arbitrage. Bayer Consumer Care AG , 819 F.3d ” = = =.

Trademark 119

Trademark Trademark Law Branding Brands 119

Patently-O

OCTOBER 27, 2021

Chevron Oronite Company LLC , No. Sulzer Mixpac AG v. Bayer Consumer Care AG , No. Janssen Pharmaceutica, N.V. , 21-202 ( NHK-Fintiv rule for denying petitions; appealability of IPR petition denial); Apple Inc. Optis Cellular Technology, LLC , No. 21-118 (mandamus review of IPR petition denial); Infineum USA L.P.

Patent Law 78

Patent Law Law Patent Settlement 78

43(B)log

OCTOBER 4, 2021

Similarly, Sulzer Mixpac AG v. The Bayer v. Belmora case; the Fourth Circuit allowed Bayer to seek the complete elimination of Belmora’s ability to use the challenged mark, though Belmora has sought cert on this question. A&N Trading Co., 19-2951 (2d Cir. Punchbowl sued AJ for trademark infringement and related claims.

IP 94

IP Trademark Advertising Advertising 94