SpicyIP

AUGUST 22, 2021

An image of a packet containing Cipla’s Duolin Repsule (Image from here ). Cipla: Madras HC Rejects COVID as an Excuse for Passing Off. In the recent case of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. In the recent case of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. Cipla Ltd. , Sun Pharma v. Kedar Ganesh Dhargalkar.

Marketing 139

Marketing Marketing Trademark Registering Trademarks 139

Selvam & Selvam Blog

APRIL 1, 2022

Cipla Ltd (Respondent/Plaintiff) refused to vacate the interim injunction against the Applicant, Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. Accordingly, Cipla Ltd brought in an action for Trademark infringement, copyright infringement and passing off. Cipla’s Contentions . Background.

Intellectual Property 40

Intellectual Property IP Copyright Infringement Artistic Work 40

IP and Legal Filings

MAY 13, 2022

The present case deals with the compulsory license awarded to a domestic generic pharmaceutical private company, Natco, for the manufacture and sale of the kidney cancer drug Nexavar, patented by Bayer Corporation in India. In Cipla Ltd. F Hoffmann- La Roche Ltd. & F Hoffmann- La Roche Ltd. &

Licensing 52

Licensing Government Invention Patent 52

SpicyIP

AUGUST 30, 2021

Cipla: Madras HC Rejects COVID as an Excuse for Passing Off. In this guest post , Kedar Ganesh Dhargalkar analyses the recent case of Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. Cipla Ltd. , Cipla Ltd. , The Defendant Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. allegedly infringed the Plaintiff Cipla Ltd.’s

Non-Fungible Tokens 105

Non-Fungible Tokens Fair Use Advertising Advertising 105

SpicyIP

JANUARY 2, 2022

Hetero Drugs Ltd [Delhi High Court]. Hetero Drugs Ltd, the Delhi High Court ruled that under section 107 of the Indian Patents Act, 1970, the export of products from India amounted to the use of the product in India. Entertainment Network India Ltd (ENIL) and Phonographic Performance Ltd (PPL) v. H Lundbeck A/S v.

IP 143

IP Intellectual Property Copyright Trademark 143

SpicyIP

APRIL 9, 2022

Citing Lupin Ltd. To arrive at this conclusion, the Single Judge Bench relied on to a full bench decision of the Bombay High Court in Cipla Ltd. Cipla Industries Pvt. Ltd (See also SpicyIP post here ). The ROC is expected to gather information from the TM Registry. ” Conclusion.

Registering Trademarks 103

Registering Trademarks Trademark Registration Government 103

SpicyIP

JULY 10, 2023

Case: Kamdhenu Ltd. Delhi High Court refuses to grant an interim injunction to TV 18 against Bennett Coleman’s use of “Bhaiya ji Superhit” Case: Tv 18 Broadcast Limited vs Bennett, Coleman, and Company on 4 July, 2023 (Delhi High Court) The plaintiff adopted the device mark ‘Bhaiyaji Kahin’ in 2016 for their television show.

Registration 98

Registration Copyright Infringement Trademark Copyright 98