Remove companies fca-us-llc
article thumbnail

Misleading and deceptive conduct – Invisalign v SmileDirectClub

LexBlog IP

The case of Invisalign Australia Pty Limited v SmileDirectClub LLC [2023] FCA 395 (Invisalign v SDC) involved two (2) companies that offer what’s referred to as the “clear aligner teeth straightening treatment” (Clear Aligner).

article thumbnail

TTAB Notice of Opposition Filings for Week of August 9, 2021

LexBlog IP

RL Brands, LLC. AOVM Companies. Radix IoT, LLC. FCA US LLC. UAMG Content, LLC. Clicked-In LLC. Editor’s Note: To discuss how to respond to a Notice of Opposition or extension request to file an opposition proceeding with the TTAB , please contact us. Engcon Holding AB. Luxco, Inc.

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

Foreign Prosecution History: To Admit, Or Not To Admit, That Remains a Puzzle To Canadian Courts

Canadian Intellectual Property Blog

2021 FCA 7 Section 53.1 In a unanimous decision, the Federal Court of Appeal (“FCA”) concluded that the Federal Court (“FC”) should have refrained from considering the prosecution history of the corresponding US Application at the trial level. In contrast, TA only used a Micronizer for heating oil seed via infrared radiation.

article thumbnail

Airing their Dirty Diapers: Final decision in Angelcare v Munchkin

IPilogue

Edgewell Personal Care Canada ULD, Playtex Products, LLC and Angelcare Canada Inc. and its American parent company Munchkin Inc. 2011 FCA 228 as: The act of infringement must be completed by the direct infringer; The act would not have been committed “but for” the inducement or encouragement; and. v Weatherford Canada Inc.

article thumbnail

“Inducing” Copyright Infringement in Canada: Is it a Thing?

IPilogue

US courts have gone this far ( MGM Studios Inc v Grokster Ltd 545 US 913 (2005)) but the UK Supreme Court has not. The UK company could, however, be used as a way to get the English courts to take jurisdiction over the better-funded foreign-based SSCS and then hold both companies jointly and severally liable.

article thumbnail

FEBRUARY 2022 RETAIL PATENT LITIGATION REPORT

LexBlog IP

2BCom, LLC v. Plaintiff: 2BCom, LLC. Adim8, LLC v. Plaintiff: Adim8, LLC. AML IP, LLC v. Ashley Furniture Industries, LLC ( multiple cases) (W.D. Plaintiff: AML IP, LLC. Digital Verification Systems, LLC v. Plaintiff: Digital Verification Systems, LLC. Digi Portal LLC v.