Remove companies h-lundbeck-a-s
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit affirms district court finding of no induced or contributory infringement of generic depression drug

JD Supra Law

Lundbeck A-S v. December 7, 2023), Plaintiffs, H. Lundbeck A/S (“Lundbeck”) and Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., collectively “Takeda”) appealed a District of Delaware ruling that several generic pharmaceutical company defendants’ Abbreviated New Drug Applications would not infringe its U.S.

Patent 103
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Affirms Skinny Label Carve Outs

Intellectual Property Law Blog

Lundbeck A/S, et al. 2021) to situations in which a generic pharmaceutical company engages in advertising or promotional activities for an infringing use. Plaintiffs (H. Lundbeck A/S, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Ltd., Lupin Ltd., The approved NDA is held by Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.,

Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

article thumbnail

Skinny Label Avoids Infringement

Patently-O

by Dennis Crouch H. Lundbeck A/S v. The Federal Circuit recently affirmed a district court judgment finding that Abbreviated New Drug Applications (“ANDAs”) submitted by generic drug manufacturers did not infringe patents rights held by H. Lupin Ltd. , 2022-1194, 2022-1208, 2022-1246 (Fed.

Patent 126
article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Affirms Skinny Label Carve Outs

JD Supra Law

Lundbeck A/S, et al. Lupin Ltd.,

article thumbnail

Federal Circuit Affirms Skinny Label Carve Outs

LexBlog IP

Lundbeck A/S, et al. This case affirms settled law that had become somewhat uncertain due to the Federal Circuit’s 2021 Glaxo opinion. 2021) to situations in which a generic pharmaceutical company engages in advertising or promotional activities for an infringing use. Plaintiffs (H. Lupin Ltd.,

article thumbnail

A Win for Skinny Labels: Insights for Enforcing Use Patents

IP Tech Blog

In the case of H. Lundbeck A/S et al. The drug was originally developed by Lundbeck and later licensed to Takeda, who is the holder of the NDA. This strategy is contentious. It provides for competition but sometimes results in infringement due to off-label use of the generic drug – a delicate balance. Lupin et al. ,

Patent 62
article thumbnail

A Win for Skinny Labels: Insights for Enforcing Use Patents

LexBlog IP

In the case of H. Lundbeck A/S et al. Takeda’s NDA for Trintellix ® (vortioxetine) Trintellix® (vortioxetine) is a drug for treating major depressive disorder in adults by enhancing serotonergic activity in the central nervous system. This strategy is contentious. Lupin et al. , FDA in 2013 under NDA No.

Patent 52