Fish & Richardson Trademark & Copyright Thoughts

NOVEMBER 1, 2022

October saw four complainants file five new Section 337 complaints with the Commission: Bell Semiconductor, LLC, filed a complaint against NXP Semiconductors, NXP B.V., Motorola Mobility, LLC, and Western Digital Technologies, Inc., Motorola Mobility, LLC, and Western Digital Technologies, Inc.,

Technology 68

Technology Television Patent 68

The IPKat

OCTOBER 7, 2021

As the examples below demonstrate, end-product suppliers often lack knowledge about how standardized technology is incorporated into their products through components and thus it falls to the component suppliers to provide critical technical information necessary to evaluate issues such as infringement: In Saint Lawrence Communications LLC v.

Licensing 57

Licensing Litigation Technology Patent 57

LexBlog IP

SEPTEMBER 7, 2022

Prime Sports Marketing LLC et al., The Motorola v. Second, Hytera has been granted leave to assert antitrust counterclaims against Motorola. Duke Hospitality, LLC. Then check out Erik Weibust’s recent post at Epstein Becker’s Trade Secrets & Mobility Blog. In LS3 Inc. Stay tuned. In Patel v.

Blogging 52

Blogging Reporting Law Litigation 52

LexBlog IP

AUGUST 2, 2022

Without further ado, here are the noteworthy developments of the past month: Noteworthy Defend Trade Secrets Act Cases, Federal Trade Secret Opinions and Related Commentary: The Motorola v. Arbor Environmental, LLC. In a thorough analysis of that decision, Prudential Locations, LLC v. Hytera litigation in the U.S.

Social Media 52

Social Media Ownership Intellectual Property Blogging 52