Remove companies reliance-trust-co
article thumbnail

SPACs: A Double-Edged Sword

LexBlog IP

Recently, a growing number of companies are choosing to go public by merging with Special Purpose Acquisition Companies (“SPACs”) instead of going through a traditional Initial Public Offerings (“IPOs”). After the SPAC IPO, the sponsors place the funds raised in a trust. By: Haodi Dong.

article thumbnail

The Contested Meaning of Web3 & Why it Matters for (IP) Lawyers

Kluwer Copyright Blog

Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) are one of many possible use cases for how blockchain technologies could help monetize creative works and reduce the reliance on intermediaries (for an analysis of copyright issues with NFTs see here and here ). Jack Dorsey tweeted another provocative idea the next day. Web3 Is More than Just Blockchain.

Ownership 117
Insiders

Sign Up for our Newsletter

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Trending Sources

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (January 02- January 09)

SpicyIP

Case: Aiwa Co Ltd. On permitted use, the court emphasized on the need to have a written agreement, and rejected the Defendant’s reliance on an affidavit by Mr. Advani, holding that it cannot amount to “permitted use”. Permitted use’ under the Trademarks Act requires a written agreement, reiterated Delhi High Court. Annapurna Films Pvt.

Trademark 105
article thumbnail

ChatGPT and Intellectual Property (IP) related Topics

LexBlog IP

On this point, Open AI answers the question “Can I trust that the AI is telling me the truth?” In short, a user can’t trust what the machine is explaining or outputting. Further, ChatGPT is limited by its reliance on the humans that trained ChatGPT in the first place. ” Id. A few points on this output.

article thumbnail

SpicyIP Weekly Review (May 8- May 13)

SpicyIP

[This Weekly Review has been co-authored with Shikhar Chauhan. vs Vijay Pal Vineet Kumar And Co. The franchisees in question are separately incorporated as a private limited company and the plaintiff asserted that the principal office does not have control over them. Case: Jaquar Company Pvt Ltd vs Villeroy Boch Ag & Anr.

Trademark 104