43(B)log

APRIL 29, 2024

23, 2024) Hetronic has US registrations; Abitron sold Hetronic-branded products without permission to customers around the world, including in the United States. It executed licensing and distribution agreements for the remotes with two European companies, collectively Abitron. Hetronic Germany GmbH, F.4th 4th -, Nos.

Advertising 59

Advertising Advertising Trademark Branding 59

LexBlog IP

APRIL 12, 2023

recently argued before the United States Supreme Court, and which presented the question of whether one could understand the language of the Lanham Act to apply outside the United States in some manner, i.e. does it have extraterritoriality and how do we define “commerce”? Hetronic International Inc.,

Law 52

Law IP Intellectual Property Copyright 52

LexBlog IP

DECEMBER 15, 2022

In Masimo Corp. Judge James Selna issued an injunction restraining the former researcher and his current company from using trade secrets arising from pulse oximetry, which involves measuring oxygen in the blood. Restrictive Covenant Cases from around the United States: Should your agreement include a liquidated damages provision?

Blogging 52

Blogging IP Confidentiality Intellectual Property 52

Technology & Marketing Law Blog

JULY 17, 2023

the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). Absent clear guidance or prohibition from the treaties, member states are free to create their own rules of extraterritoriality. First, the Court had to address its longstanding precedent in Steele v.

Trademark 69

Trademark Blogging Litigation Law 69